Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rimini using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fornasa Andrea's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fornasa Andrea's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fornasa Andrea's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fornasa Andrea's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:17 | 08:33 to 06:16 | 42.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:45 | 09:17 to 07:32 | 32.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 06:24 to 05:36 | 15.0% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:18 to 05:03 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:49 to 04:38 | 3.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:30 to 02:26 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:06 to 03:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:28 to 44:28 | 0.0% |
| Fornasa Andrea | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:20 | 00:00 | 05:03 -02:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 02:20 | 04:38 +00:11 | 05:03 -02:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 07:09 | 05:29 -00:53 | 09:41 -02:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 11:45 | 03:19 -00:13 | 15:10 -03:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 14:51 | 05:59 -00:26 | 18:29 -03:38 |
| Sled Pull | 06:24 | 20:24 | 05:45 +00:39 | 24:28 -04:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 26:48 | 06:01 -00:34 | 30:13 -03:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:33 | 32:15 | 06:28 +02:05 | 36:14 -03:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 40:48 | 06:15 +00:17 | 42:42 -01:54 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 47:20 | 05:06 +00:12 | 48:57 -01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 52:38 | 06:03 -00:05 | 54:03 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 58:36 | 02:28 +00:02 | 01:00:06 -01:30 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 01:01:06 | 06:03 +00:09 | 01:02:34 -01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 01:07:18 | 06:04 -00:25 | 01:08:37 -01:19 |
| Running 8 | 07:52 | 01:12:57 | 07:02 +00:50 | 01:14:41 -01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 09:17 | 01:20:49 | 07:51 +01:26 | 01:21:43 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:51 | 01:37:53 | 08:19 -00:28 | 01:37:53 |
Andrea Fornasa demonstrated a promising performance in the 2024 Rimini HYROX, finishing in the top 54% overall and top 52% in his age group. Notably, Andrea's total running time was 03:49 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his performance in several strength and endurance segments, notably the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, was significantly below average, suggesting a need for a more balanced training focus. His pacing started exceptionally strong but showed signs of fatigue in later segments, suggesting potential overexertion in the early stages of the race or a need for improved endurance.
In conclusion, while Andrea's running prowess stands out as a core strength, focusing on improving explosive power, functional strength, and pacing strategies will be crucial for ascending in the rankings. By addressing these key areas through specific training interventions and strategic race planning, Andrea has the potential to significantly improve his future HYROX performances.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Tom | 2022 Dallas | 01:37:59 | |
| Hill Antony | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:13 | |
| Mullan Richie | 2023 Dublin | 01:38:10 | |
| Mahendran Dinesh | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:38:00 | |
| Niedbał Kamil | 2024 Katowice | 01:38:03 | |
| Suchy Sven | 2022 Bremen | 01:37:31 | |
| Chan Kit | 2023 Singapore | 01:38:22 | |
| Fontana Denis | 2024 Milan | 01:38:05 | |
| Van Dooren Lenny | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:38:23 | |
| Cousin Asher | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:37:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
