Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
984 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 984 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 984 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Hegarty Steve's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hegarty Steve's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 984 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hegarty Steve's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hegarty Steve's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:09.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 984 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Steve Hegarty's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race was commendable, especially given his age group of 60-64. He finished in the top 53% overall and ranked 5th in his age category, indicating a competitive edge. His total running time was faster than the average by 1:53, showcasing a strong runner profile. However, his pacing suggests that he might have started slightly conservatively, with initial running segments being slower or only marginally faster than average, which improved as the race progressed. Steve's strengths are clearly in running and some strength exercises, such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Farmers Carry, where he significantly outperformed the average.
Segments to Improve
Wall Balls: Steve was 1:28 slower than average. To improve, focus on developing shoulder strength and endurance. Exercises like shoulder presses, wall ball drills with lighter weights for higher reps, and practicing breathing techniques during the exercise could help. Form corrections such as maintaining a strong core and consistent squat depth could enhance efficiency.
Sandbag Lunges: With a time 1:32 slower than average, leg strength and stability are key areas of improvement. Incorporate lunges with weights, Bulgarian split squats, and balance drills in his routine. Practicing lunges with a focus on posture and balance can improve performance under fatigue.
Roxzone: Steve took longer transitions with a time of 51 seconds slower than average. To enhance transition efficiency, focus on circuit training that mimics race conditions. Develop a routine that includes quick transitions between exercises to build habit and speed. Work on overall fitness to reduce recovery time needed between zones.
Sled Pull: Being 13 seconds slower than average, Steve could benefit from improving his grip strength and pulling power. Exercises like deadlifts, bent-over rows, and grip strengtheners can aid in this area. Practicing with varying weights and techniques can also help.
Rowing: Steve was 20 seconds slower here. Focus on rowing technique and cardiovascular endurance. Incorporate interval training on the rowing machine and practice maintaining a steady stroke rate. Core strengthening exercises will also improve rowing efficiency.
Race Strategies
Given his strong running profile, Steve should aim to conserve energy on the running segments while maintaining a steady pace to ensure he has the endurance for strength exercises.
Implement visualization techniques and mental strategies to prepare for each transition, reducing the time spent in the Roxzone.
Practice race-specific drills that involve running immediately after strength exercises to simulate race conditions and prepare for compromised running scenarios.
Work on a consistent pacing strategy that allows for a strong finish, ensuring energy is reserved for the latter, more demanding segments of the race.