Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Francis Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Francis Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Francis Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Francis Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
02:30.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Steven Francis demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox event, finishing in the top 24% overall and the top 30% in his age group. He completed the race in 01:20:15, showcasing a strong running ability with a total running time of 00:40:19, which is 00:18 faster than the average. This indicates that Steven has a strong runner profile but could benefit from enhancing his strength component to achieve a more balanced performance. Notably, Steven started relatively slower in the initial running segment but maintained a consistent pace through the subsequent running portions, suggesting an effective pacing strategy once the race was underway.
Segments to Improve
Roxzone: The transition time was 01:08 slower than average, indicating a need for quicker transitions. To improve, Steven should focus on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to enhance overall fitness and agility drills to decrease transition times. Exercises such as shuttle runs, ladder drills, and box jumps can improve agility and quickness.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was 00:13 slower than average. Improving explosive power and endurance will be key here. Incorporate plyometric exercises like jump squats and box jumps into the routine. Also, practice burpees in a circuit style to mimic race conditions.
Sandbag Lunges: With a time 00:11 slower than average, focusing on lower body strength and endurance is essential. Add weighted lunges, Bulgarian split squats, and sandbag training to build the necessary strength and technique.
Sled Pull: Slightly slower than optimal, suggesting a need for improved upper body and core strength. Training should include sled drags, resistance band pulls, and core stabilization exercises like planks and Russian twists.
Wall Balls: Despite being faster than average, improving accuracy and endurance can yield better results. Practice wall balls in sets with a focus on maintaining form, and integrate overhead throws and medicine ball slams to enhance power.
Race Strategies
Transition Efficiency: Practice rapid gear changes and mental transitions between exercises. Implement practice sessions that simulate race conditions, emphasizing quick adaptation from one station to the next.
Pacing Strategy: Continue with the current pacing strategy but consider slightly increasing the pace in the initial running segment without compromising overall endurance. This can be achieved by incorporating tempo runs and threshold workouts.
Compromised Running: Integrate compromised running drills post-exercise (e.g., running immediately after sled pulls or burpees) to simulate race fatigue and improve running efficiency under fatigue.