Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Miller Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Miller Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Miller Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Miller Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:46 | 06:00 to 04:14 | 34.4% |
| Run Total | 01:42 | 40:00 to 38:18 | 33.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:56 | 05:10 to 04:14 | 18.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:42 to 02:22 | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:47 to 04:32 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:22 to 04:13 | 2.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Miller Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:55 | 04:20 +00:02 | 04:18 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 09:17 | 04:37 -00:01 | 08:38 +00:39 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 13:53 | 02:40 +00:02 | 13:15 +00:38 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 16:35 | 05:00 -00:09 | 15:55 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 21:26 | 04:26 -00:29 | 20:55 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 04:51 | 25:23 | 04:59 -00:08 | 25:21 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 30:14 | 04:38 +01:22 | 30:20 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 36:14 | 05:07 -00:03 | 34:58 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 41:18 | 04:39 +00:08 | 40:05 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 46:05 | 05:01 +00:11 | 44:44 +01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 51:17 | 02:00 -00:25 | 49:45 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 52:52 | 05:00 +00:06 | 51:45 +01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 57:58 | 04:34 +00:36 | 56:45 +01:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:26 | 01:03:08 | 05:27 -00:01 | 01:01:19 +01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:08:34 | 05:44 -00:38 | 01:06:46 +01:48 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:18:25 | 05:55 -01:04 | 01:18:25 |
Nick Miller, competing in the HYROX age group 40-44, has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester event. He ranked 500 overall, placing him in the top 41% of 1203 athletes. In his age group, he secured rank 73, which puts him in the top 43% of 169 athletes. This is an impressive achievement given the competitive nature of the event.
Given his total running time of 00:40:00, which is 00:19 slower than average, it appears that Nick has more of a strength-oriented profile. His best running lap was timed at 00:04:36. He started the race a bit slower than average in Running 1 but gradually improved his running pace in the subsequent segments, indicating a good race strategy.
Considering Nick's strength-oriented profile, he can benefit from working on the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Shaun | 2023 London | 01:18:15 | |
| Murphy Chris | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:38 | |
| Wieland Jens | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:04 | |
| Lee Chunghwan | 2024 Incheon | 01:18:41 | |
| Dekeyser Thomas | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:18:30 | |
| Kapicak Martin | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:18:42 | |
| Milland Fabrice | 2022 Basel | 01:18:49 | |
| Novak Mario | 2022 Wien | 01:17:59 | |
| Villalongue Maxime | 2022 Madrid | 01:18:32 | |
| Fitzgerald Keith | 2024 Berlin | 01:18:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
