Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fairbairn Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fairbairn Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fairbairn Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fairbairn Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:47 | 06:35 to 04:48 | 48.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:42 to 01:59 | 19.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 05:16 to 04:40 | 16.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 06:13 to 05:50 | 10.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 04:40 to 04:29 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:29 to 40:29 | 0.0% |
| Fairbairn Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 04:10 | 04:24 -00:18 | 04:33 -00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:16 | 04:52 -00:14 | 08:57 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 12:54 | 02:52 -00:20 | 13:49 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 15:26 | 05:18 -00:18 | 16:41 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 20:26 | 04:49 -00:09 | 21:59 -01:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 25:06 | 05:15 -00:09 | 26:48 -01:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 30:12 | 05:07 +01:28 | 32:03 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 36:47 | 05:26 -00:05 | 37:10 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 42:08 | 04:46 -00:17 | 42:36 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 46:37 | 05:18 +00:00 | 47:22 -00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 51:55 | 02:08 +00:34 | 52:40 -00:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 54:37 | 05:17 -00:13 | 54:48 -00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:16 | 59:41 | 04:57 +00:19 | 01:00:05 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:04:57 | 05:51 +00:05 | 01:05:02 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:13 | 01:10:53 | 06:16 -00:03 | 01:10:53 +00:00 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:23:45 | 06:36 +00:10 | 01:23:45 |
Tom Fairbairn displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank in the top 26% and an age group rank in the top 28%. His total running time was notably faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Tom's best running lap was an impressive 00:04:38. However, the early stages of the race suggest that he may have started slightly too fast, as his pace slowed in the latter running segments. His performance in the strength-based exercises varied, suggesting a need for more balanced training to complement his running ability.
By implementing these targeted training strategies and race techniques, Tom Fairbairn can enhance his performance in future Hyrox events, turning identified weaknesses into strengths and achieving greater overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Nguessan Paul | 2023 Paris | 01:23:20 | |
| Rüttimann Maurin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:17 | |
| Schlicht Tobias | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:23:56 | |
| Fricker Mark | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:14 | |
| Dippel Max | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:23:33 | |
| Clark Kai | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:03 | |
| Studer Peti | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:43 | |
| Kamenicek David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:26 | |
| Rayner Dave | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:13 | |
| Coe Christian | 2023 Malmö | 01:23:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:46:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
