Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Barcelona using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 726 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Collovray David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Collovray David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Collovray David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Collovray David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:13 | 59:16 to 52:03 | 96.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 06:47 to 06:33 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:27 to 07:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Collovray David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 05:24 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:35 | 04:48 -00:16 | 05:24 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 10:07 | 06:01 -00:08 | 10:12 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 16:00 | 03:41 +00:02 | 16:13 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 07:04 | 19:43 | 06:43 +00:21 | 19:54 -00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 06:47 | 26:47 | 06:33 +00:14 | 26:37 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 08:21 | 33:34 | 06:43 +01:38 | 33:10 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:27 | 41:55 | 07:39 -00:12 | 39:53 +02:02 |
| Running 5 | 07:44 | 49:22 | 07:02 +00:42 | 47:32 +01:50 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 57:06 | 05:22 -00:18 | 54:34 +02:32 |
| Running 6 | 07:19 | 01:02:10 | 06:51 +00:28 | 59:56 +02:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 01:09:29 | 02:44 -00:24 | 01:06:47 +02:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:59 | 01:11:49 | 06:49 +00:10 | 01:09:31 +02:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:18:48 | 07:01 -01:25 | 01:16:20 +02:28 |
| Running 8 | 10:24 | 01:24:24 | 08:21 +02:03 | 01:23:21 +01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:34:48 | 09:13 -03:42 | 01:31:42 +03:06 |
| Roxzone | 11:01 | 01:51:12 | 10:17 +00:44 | 01:51:12 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is evident that David struggled in the running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 8. These segments accounted for the majority of his time lost during the race. Additionally, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that he may have taken more time to transition between exercise zones.
In summary, David Collovray performed well in the Hyrox race in Barcelona, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and implementing specific training strategies for running and strength, David can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gomez Paredes Jesus Roberto | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:51:21 | |
| Ulbrich Philipp | 2022 Berlin | 01:50:50 | |
| Been Nick | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:50:46 | |
| Tarroux Benjamin | 2024 Paris | 01:51:13 | |
| Barron Dion | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:50:53 | |
| Bentien Ronald | 2024 Hamburg | 01:51:24 | |
| Chan Chuen Shan | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:51:20 | |
| Achterberg Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:51:13 | |
| Pflugradt Marco | 2023 Hamburg | 01:51:20 | |
| Mendez Tapia Juan Manuel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:51:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
