Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire King Amanda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights King Amanda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the King Amanda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve King Amanda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:05 | 48:50 to 46:45 | 66.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 06:49 to 06:12 | 19.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 05:55 to 05:41 | 7.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:31 to 05:23 | 4.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 04:53 to 04:50 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| King Amanda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:36 | 05:11 -00:25 | 05:15 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 10:22 | 05:39 +00:04 | 10:26 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 16:05 | 02:52 -00:19 | 16:05 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 18:38 | 05:58 -00:11 | 18:57 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 24:25 | 06:03 -00:08 | 24:55 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 30:20 | 05:59 +00:08 | 30:58 -00:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 36:27 | 06:34 +00:15 | 36:57 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 43:16 | 06:10 +00:39 | 43:31 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 50:05 | 05:27 +00:04 | 49:41 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 55:36 | 06:03 +00:03 | 55:08 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:01:42 | 02:21 -00:10 | 01:01:11 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:03:53 | 06:02 +00:08 | 01:03:32 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:10:03 | 05:02 -00:09 | 01:09:34 +00:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:35 | 01:14:56 | 06:33 +00:02 | 01:14:36 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 04:10 | 01:21:31 | 05:13 -01:03 | 01:21:09 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 08:05 | 01:33:39 | 07:17 +00:48 | 01:33:39 |
Amanda King delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 380 out of 1801 athletes and securing a position in the top 21%. Within her age group of 30-34, she ranked 85th, placing her in the top 20%. Her overall time was 01:33:39. An analysis of her pacing reveals that Amanda maintained a consistent start, though her running times were predominantly slower than average. Her total running time of 00:48:50 was 33 seconds slower than the average, indicating that running is an area for potential improvement. Amanda showed strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Push, suggesting she has a hybrid profile with a slight edge in strength-based events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moyle Rebecca | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:52 | |
| Church Claire | 2022 London | 01:34:08 | |
| Mchugh Niamh | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:10 | |
| Brunt Noa | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:31 | |
| Watson Hannah | 2024 Madrid | 01:33:38 | |
| Wild Kyra | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:00 | |
| Wong Queenie | 2021 New York | 01:33:22 | |
| 김 지수 | 2024 Incheon | 01:33:47 | |
| Bußmann Maike | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:14 | |
| Mcgrath Kalsi | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
