Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glas Charlotte's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glas Charlotte's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glas Charlotte's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glas Charlotte's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:48 | 44:35 to 42:47 | 42.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:51 | 06:04 to 05:13 | 20.2% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:36 to 05:08 | 11.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 05:19 to 04:54 | 9.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 05:18 to 04:56 | 8.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:32 to 02:21 | 4.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 04:07 to 04:00 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Glas Charlotte | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 04:38 | 05:00 +00:19 | 04:57 -00:19 |
| Running 2 | 07:02 | 09:57 | 05:16 +01:46 | 09:57 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 16:59 | 02:36 -00:04 | 15:13 +01:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 19:31 | 05:30 -00:13 | 17:49 +01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 24:48 | 05:23 -00:05 | 23:19 +01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 30:06 | 05:32 -00:06 | 28:42 +01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 35:32 | 05:34 +00:30 | 34:14 +01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 41:36 | 05:40 -00:07 | 39:48 +01:48 |
| Rowing | 05:36 | 47:09 | 05:16 +00:20 | 45:28 +01:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 52:45 | 05:34 -00:18 | 50:44 +02:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 58:01 | 02:10 -00:22 | 56:18 +01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 59:49 | 05:31 -00:03 | 58:28 +01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 01:05:17 | 04:27 -00:39 | 01:03:59 +01:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:09:05 | 05:54 +00:04 | 01:08:26 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:07 | 01:15:03 | 04:28 -00:21 | 01:14:20 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:05 | 01:25:08 | 06:20 -00:15 | 01:25:08 |
Charlotte's best running lap was 00:04:38, which was 00:07 faster than the average. This indicates that she has good speed and endurance in short bursts. However, her performance in the other segments of the race varied.
For the Running 2 segment, which was 01:49 slower than average, Charlotte should work on improving her running endurance. This can be achieved through interval training, long-distance runs, and incorporating hill sprints into her training routine. Additionally, focusing on improving her running technique, such as proper stride length and foot strike, can help optimize her running efficiency.
In the Burpees Broad Jump segment, where Charlotte was 00:46 slower than average, she should focus on improving her explosiveness and upper body strength. Incorporating plyometric exercises such as box jumps, squat jumps, and medicine ball throws can help increase her power output. Additionally, practicing proper form and technique for burpees, including efficient transitions between each movement, can help reduce time spent in this segment.
For the Rowing and Ski Erg segments, where Charlotte was 00:23 and 00:21 slower than average, respectively, she should focus on improving her endurance and technique in these exercises. Incorporating rowing and ski erg intervals into her training routine can help improve her cardiovascular fitness and efficiency in these movements. Additionally, practicing proper form and technique, such as maintaining a strong core and utilizing the legs and upper body effectively, can help optimize her performance in these segments.
In summary, Charlotte Glas had a strong performance in the 2023 Hannover HYROX race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific segments where she lost time compared to the average, implementing targeted training strategies, and optimizing her pacing and transition time, Charlotte can enhance her overall race performance and further excel in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rickards Kate | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:48 | |
| Kenyon Karly | 2023 Dallas | 01:24:49 | |
| Helfert Verena | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:24:40 | |
| Demonte Roberta | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:47 | |
| Banks Emma | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:38 | |
| Orring Johanna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:35 | |
| Allen Radka | 2023 London | 01:24:54 | |
| Plazanic Alexandra | 2022 Essen | 01:25:10 | |
| Lioumi Maria | 2023 London | 01:25:37 | |
| Houston Jan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
