Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Wien using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hofer Jürgen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hofer Jürgen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hofer Jürgen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hofer Jürgen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:05 | 43:34 to 41:29 | 50.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 07:09 to 06:01 | 27.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:12 to 04:48 | 9.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:54 to 04:36 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:11 to 02:02 | 3.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 05:00 to 04:58 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Hofer Jürgen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:48 | 04:26 -00:06 | 04:35 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:08 | 04:55 +00:21 | 09:01 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 14:24 | 02:51 -00:47 | 13:56 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 16:28 | 05:22 +00:28 | 16:47 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:18 | 04:53 +00:01 | 22:09 +00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 27:12 | 05:20 +00:36 | 27:02 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 33:08 | 05:16 -00:16 | 32:22 +00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 38:08 | 05:30 +00:14 | 37:38 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 43:52 | 04:48 -00:24 | 43:08 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 48:16 | 05:22 +00:18 | 47:56 +00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 53:56 | 02:10 +00:01 | 53:18 +00:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 56:07 | 05:21 +00:04 | 55:28 +00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:12 | 01:01:32 | 05:03 +00:09 | 01:00:49 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 01:06:44 | 05:57 -00:59 | 01:05:52 +00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 07:09 | 01:11:42 | 06:27 +00:42 | 01:11:49 -00:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:09 | 01:25:00 | 06:44 -00:35 | 01:25:00 |
Based on the splits analysis, Hofer's total running time of 00:43:34 is 02:14 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time to improve his performance in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:48 suggests that he has good speed, but there is room for improvement in terms of pacing and endurance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Jürgen Hofer can improve his overall performance in future HYROX races. It is important for him to focus on both his running endurance and strength to excel in all aspects of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Tony | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:45 | |
| Thomas Lachlan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:24 | |
| Williams Kristian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:40 | |
| Hargedahl Oskar | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:49 | |
| Bannon Mark | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:24:42 | |
| Jamieson Colin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:19 | |
| Shirt Joshua | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:31 | |
| Mascioli Giampaolo | 2023 Milan | 01:24:33 | |
| Van Der Have Arjan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:36 | |
| Van Erp Robbie | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Wien | 01:16:53 | |
| 2019 Nürnberg | 01:22:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
