Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Maastricht European Championships using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peters Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peters Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peters Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peters Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:03 | 44:21 to 40:18 | 74.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 05:06 to 04:24 | 12.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:37 to 04:19 | 5.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 05:53 to 05:42 | 3.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:40 to 04:35 | 1.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 1.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:42 to 04:39 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Peters Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 04:29 +01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:38 | 04:24 +00:13 | 04:29 +01:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 10:15 | 04:51 +00:17 | 08:53 +01:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 15:23 | 02:49 -00:23 | 13:44 +01:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 17:49 | 05:14 +00:24 | 16:33 +01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 23:27 | 04:44 +00:22 | 21:47 +01:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 28:33 | 05:12 +00:04 | 26:31 +02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 33:49 | 05:02 -00:17 | 31:43 +02:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 38:34 | 05:21 -00:01 | 36:45 +01:49 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 43:54 | 04:44 -00:02 | 42:06 +01:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 48:36 | 05:14 -00:04 | 46:50 +01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 53:46 | 02:07 -00:22 | 52:04 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:47 | 55:31 | 05:13 +01:34 | 54:11 +01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 01:02:18 | 04:52 -00:12 | 59:24 +02:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:06:58 | 05:43 -00:15 | 01:04:16 +02:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:53 | 01:12:26 | 06:14 -00:21 | 01:09:59 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 04:26 | 01:22:37 | 06:24 -01:58 | 01:22:37 |
In terms of his splits, Mark's total running time was 00:44:21, which was 04:51 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could improve his running performance to gain an advantage in the race. However, it is worth noting that Mark had a faster running time in Running 6, where he was 00:03 faster than the average. This suggests that he has potential in running and should focus on improving his overall fitness and running technique.
In terms of transitions between exercises and rest periods (Roxzone), Mark should work on improving his overall fitness and reducing transition times. This can be achieved through high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions and practicing quick transitions between exercises in his training sessions.
Overall, Mark has shown potential in certain areas, particularly in Running 6. By focusing on improving his running performance and overall fitness, he can enhance his overall performance in future HYROX races. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, as mentioned above, will help him turn his weaknesses into strengths and ultimately improve his performance in the sport.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:13 | |
| Bainbridge Steve | 2023 London | 01:22:36 | |
| Tsang Sai Kit | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:35 | |
| Thompson Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:42 | |
| Stefanovic Serge | 2023 Melbourne | 01:22:10 | |
| Singleton Morgan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:48 | |
| Healy Darren | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:32 | |
| Watson Henry | 2023 London | 01:22:07 | |
| Tebb Duncan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:01 | |
| Akbari Hamid | 2023 Dubai | 01:22:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
