Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 952 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Murphy Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Murphy Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Murphy Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Murphy Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:54 | 54:20 to 50:26 | 61.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:43 | 10:17 to 08:34 | 27.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 07:18 to 06:33 | 11.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Murphy Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 05:19 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:41 | 04:45 -00:33 | 05:19 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 07:53 | 05:51 -00:26 | 10:04 -02:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 13:18 | 03:37 -01:37 | 15:55 -02:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:34 | 15:18 | 06:27 +00:07 | 19:32 -04:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 21:52 | 06:21 -00:56 | 25:59 -04:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:12 | 27:17 | 06:26 -00:14 | 32:20 -05:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:14 | 33:29 | 07:14 -01:00 | 38:46 -05:17 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 39:43 | 06:45 +00:18 | 46:00 -06:17 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 46:46 | 05:16 -00:16 | 52:45 -05:59 |
| Running 6 | 07:17 | 51:46 | 06:30 +00:47 | 58:01 -06:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 59:03 | 02:40 -00:36 | 01:04:31 -05:28 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:01:07 | 06:31 +00:35 | 01:07:11 -06:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:18 | 01:08:13 | 06:46 +00:32 | 01:13:42 -05:29 |
| Running 8 | 11:05 | 01:15:31 | 07:52 +03:13 | 01:20:28 -04:57 |
| Wall Balls | 10:17 | 01:26:36 | 08:56 +01:21 | 01:28:20 -01:44 |
| Roxzone | 09:50 | 01:46:37 | 09:21 +00:29 | 01:46:37 |
Nathan Murphy delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing within the top 63% overall and the top 68% in his age group. His overall time was 01:46:37. Notably, Nathan demonstrated strong skill in the strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Ski Erg, which indicates a solid strength profile. However, his total running time was 02:08 slower than the average, suggesting that he is more strength-oriented and could benefit from enhanced running training. His initial running segments were significantly faster, but his pace dropped considerably in later segments, indicating a potential issue with pacing or endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Becher Lassaad | 2024 Paris | 01:46:48 | |
| Dispo Duke | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:46:08 | |
| Angel Lenn | 2024 Paris | 01:46:24 | |
| Willingale Adam | 2023 London | 01:46:32 | |
| Tehuiotoa Taaroa | 2023 Paris | 01:46:24 | |
| Beaudouin Vanilo | 2024 Houston | 01:47:02 | |
| Jeck Robert | 2022 Leipzig | 01:47:05 | |
| Deufel Thorsten | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:46:43 | |
| Van Der Sloot Jordy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:03 | |
| Hay Matt | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
