Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rousseaux Antoine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rousseaux Antoine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rousseaux Antoine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rousseaux Antoine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:48 | 50:02 to 47:14 | 77.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 06:15 to 05:54 | 9.7% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:18 to 05:03 | 6.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 05:45 to 05:38 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:44 to 04:39 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Rousseaux Antoine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 05:04 -01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:29 | 04:38 +00:06 | 05:04 -01:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 08:13 | 05:31 -00:13 | 09:42 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 13:31 | 03:18 -00:05 | 15:13 -01:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 16:44 | 06:02 -00:12 | 18:31 -01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:45 | 22:34 | 05:45 +00:00 | 24:33 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 28:19 | 06:02 -00:17 | 30:18 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 34:04 | 06:34 -00:15 | 36:20 -02:16 |
| Running 5 | 08:41 | 40:23 | 06:16 +02:25 | 42:54 -02:31 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 49:04 | 05:07 +00:11 | 49:10 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 07:53 | 54:22 | 06:06 +01:47 | 54:17 +00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:02:15 | 02:29 -00:32 | 01:00:23 +01:52 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:04:12 | 06:04 +00:15 | 01:02:52 +01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:10:31 | 06:09 +00:06 | 01:08:56 +01:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:16:46 | 07:04 -00:14 | 01:15:05 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:23:36 | 07:51 -01:50 | 01:22:09 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 08:57 | 01:38:28 | 08:28 +00:29 | 01:38:28 |
Antoine Rousseaux delivered a commendable performance in the HYROX race held in Amsterdam, finishing in the top 55% overall. Notably, his strongest segment was the initial run, where he paced significantly faster than average, indicating a potential for strong starts. However, the decline in running pace, particularly in the later segments, suggests a need for improved endurance and pacing strategy. His overall running time was slower than average, highlighting a potential focus on enhancing running endurance. The athlete exhibited a hybrid profile, with a slight leaning towards strength, as evidenced by his performance in strength-based exercises like Wall Balls where he ranked in the 14th percentile. His Roxzone time, slower than average, indicates room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness.
By addressing these areas and implementing the suggested strategies, Antoine can improve his overall race performance, enhance his endurance, and capitalize on his strengths in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcglashan Craig | 2023 Glasgow | 01:38:48 | |
| Khanna Dhruv | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:38 | |
| Peters Markus | 2022 Essen | 01:38:15 | |
| Dawson Keith | 2024 Stockholm | 01:38:22 | |
| Kasperek Martin | 2023 München | 01:38:51 | |
| David Christian | 2024 Sydney | 01:38:12 | |
| Prince Luke | 2023 London | 01:38:40 | |
| Mullan Declan | 2024 Dublin | 01:38:02 | |
| Perugini Fabio | 2024 Turin | 01:38:10 | |
| Blokland Koen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
