Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jackson Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jackson Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jackson Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jackson Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:17 | 04:06 to 02:49 | 26.2% |
| Run Total | 01:03 | 43:43 to 42:40 | 21.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 05:38 to 04:49 | 16.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 02:43 to 02:07 | 12.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:29 | 05:43 to 05:14 | 9.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:28 to 05:01 | 9.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 | 06:32 to 06:19 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Jackson Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 04:40 +01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 06:04 | 04:29 -00:03 | 04:40 +01:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 10:30 | 05:05 -00:09 | 09:09 +01:21 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 15:26 | 02:59 +01:07 | 14:14 +01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 19:32 | 05:33 -00:02 | 17:13 +02:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 25:03 | 05:05 +00:33 | 22:46 +02:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 30:41 | 05:31 -00:04 | 27:51 +02:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 36:08 | 05:33 +00:10 | 33:22 +02:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 41:51 | 05:42 -00:24 | 38:55 +02:56 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 47:09 | 04:52 -00:22 | 44:37 +02:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 51:39 | 05:33 -00:17 | 49:29 +02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 56:55 | 02:14 +00:29 | 55:02 +01:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 59:38 | 05:32 -00:25 | 57:16 +02:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:28 | 01:04:45 | 05:18 +00:10 | 01:02:48 +01:57 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:10:13 | 06:11 -00:03 | 01:08:06 +02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 06:32 | 01:16:21 | 06:45 -00:13 | 01:14:17 +02:04 |
| Roxzone | 05:21 | 01:28:05 | 07:03 -01:42 | 01:28:05 |
Joe's total running time was 00:43:43, which was 01:36 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that Joe may need to focus on improving his running performance in order to enhance his overall race performance. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:56, indicating that he has the potential to excel in running if he continues to train and improve.
In conclusion, Joe Jackson had a solid performance in the 2023 Manchester Hyrox race. While he demonstrated strengths in certain segments, there are areas where he can improve his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, Joe can enhance his running performance, improve his strength and efficiency in various segments, and ultimately enhance his overall race performance. With continued dedication and targeted training, Joe has the potential to achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shpakoff Brian | 2023 Dallas | 01:27:59 | |
| Chia Ben | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:38 | |
| Sanchez Lazaro Axel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:27:35 | |
| Fabian Stefan | 2018 Leipzig | 01:27:42 | |
| Molloy David | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:03 | |
| Majchrzak Marco | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:27:52 | |
| O Donoghue Ciaran | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:31 | |
| Canfor Patrick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:14 | |
| Jonietz Oliver | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:34 | |
| Guadiana Jesus | 2024 Houston | 01:27:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:27:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
