Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Mcmenemy Alan's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Mcmenemy Alan hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Mcmenemy Alan’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcmenemy Alan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:18 | 45:29 to 43:11 | 70.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 05:23 to 04:54 | 14.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:47 to 04:27 | 10.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:15 to 02:09 | 3.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:54 to 02:52 | 1.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Mcmenemy Alan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:57 | 04:30 +00:17 | 04:47 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:44 | 05:06 -00:13 | 09:17 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:37 | 03:02 -00:08 | 14:23 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 17:31 | 05:34 -00:07 | 17:25 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 22:58 | 05:12 +00:11 | 22:59 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 28:21 | 05:33 -00:03 | 28:11 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 33:51 | 05:42 -00:21 | 33:44 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 39:12 | 05:44 +00:06 | 39:26 -00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 45:02 | 04:53 -00:04 | 45:10 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 49:51 | 05:34 +00:29 | 50:03 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 55:54 | 02:17 -00:02 | 55:37 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 58:09 | 05:33 +00:28 | 57:54 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:04:10 | 05:25 -01:01 | 01:03:27 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:08:34 | 06:15 +00:37 | 01:08:52 -00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:09 | 01:15:26 | 06:54 -01:45 | 01:15:07 +00:19 |
| Roxzone | 08:53 | 01:29:21 | 07:20 +01:33 | 01:29:21 |
Based on his splits, it is evident that Alan's strength lies in his running abilities, as he had a faster total running time compared to the average for his finish time. However, his running segments (Running 1, Running 2, etc.) were slightly slower than average. This suggests that Alan could benefit from focusing on improving his running speed and efficiency.
In conclusion, Alan Mcmenemy had a commendable performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running speed and efficiency, reducing transition time in the roxzone, and incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, strategic rest, and proper nutrition and hydration will also contribute to his overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmitt Sven | 2018 Leipzig | 01:29:23 | |
| Arienti Andrea | 2024 Turin | 01:29:19 | |
| Bock Sebastian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:43 | |
| Priebe Ondry | 2024 Milan | 01:28:56 | |
| Guzman Jeff | 2024 Anaheim | 01:29:06 | |
| Jackson Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:26 | |
| Firing Robin | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:46 | |
| Hind Matthew | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:00 | |
| Mackenzie James | 2023 London | 01:29:42 | |
| Liu Vian | 2023 München | 01:29:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:26:02 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:33:31 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
