Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 98 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lacey Gemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lacey Gemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lacey Gemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lacey Gemma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 17:11 to 10:22 | 44.8% |
| Run Total | 05:45 | 01:07:31 to 01:01:46 | 37.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:29 | 09:00 to 07:31 | 9.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:10 | 05:14 to 04:04 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 06:07 to 06:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Lacey Gemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:41 | 00:00 | 06:53 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:35 | 06:41 | 05:42 -00:07 | 06:53 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 07:49 | 12:16 | 08:14 -00:25 | 12:35 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 05:14 | 20:05 | 03:44 +01:30 | 20:49 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 08:44 | 25:19 | 08:19 +00:25 | 24:33 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 34:03 | 08:10 -03:35 | 32:52 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 09:10 | 38:38 | 08:30 +00:40 | 41:02 -02:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 17:11 | 47:48 | 11:23 +05:48 | 49:32 -01:44 |
| Running 5 | 09:01 | 01:04:59 | 08:55 +00:06 | 01:00:55 +04:04 |
| Rowing | 06:07 | 01:14:00 | 06:13 -00:06 | 01:09:50 +04:10 |
| Running 6 | 08:01 | 01:20:07 | 08:29 -00:28 | 01:16:03 +04:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 01:28:08 | 02:58 -00:48 | 01:24:32 +03:36 |
| Running 7 | 08:04 | 01:30:18 | 08:39 -00:35 | 01:27:30 +02:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:00 | 01:38:22 | 08:24 +00:36 | 01:36:09 +02:13 |
| Running 8 | 10:05 | 01:47:22 | 10:27 -00:22 | 01:44:33 +02:49 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:57:27 | 08:51 -02:35 | 01:55:00 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 11:29 | 02:15:03 | 11:12 +00:17 | 02:15:03 |
Based on the splits analysis, Gemma performed particularly well in the Ski Erg, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls segments, consistently outperforming the average times. However, there were some areas where she lost time, namely the Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Push, Running 4, Sandbag Lunges, Running 3, and Running 5 segments.
Overall, Gemma Lacey has shown great potential in the Hyrox race, with strong running abilities and solid performances in various segments. By focusing on improving specific areas and implementing effective race strategies, she can further enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hayes Amanda | 2023 Dallas | 02:15:33 | |
| Dias Natacha | 2023 Barcelona | 02:15:00 | |
| Weigert Jacqueline | 2020 Karlsruhe | 02:15:06 | |
| Mcbride Julia | 2024 Dallas | 02:15:21 | |
| Franskousky Jill | 2024 Dallas | 02:15:30 | |
| ZendelEllis Hayley | 2024 Birmingham | 02:14:57 | |
| Walsh Sarah | 2024 New York | 02:15:23 | |
| Osseforth Anisha | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:14:39 | |
| Guel Gris | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:14:36 | |
| Titus Shara | 2020 Chicago | 02:15:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 02:10:30 | |
| 2022 London | 02:31:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
