Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Armour Andy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Armour Andy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Armour Andy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armour Andy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:09 | 44:38 to 41:29 | 54.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:57 | 06:45 to 04:48 | 33.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:17 to 02:41 | 10.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:06 to 02:02 | 1.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:39 to 04:36 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Armour Andy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:59 | 04:27 -00:15 | 04:36 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:11 | 04:57 +00:10 | 09:03 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 14:18 | 02:54 +00:23 | 14:00 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 17:35 | 05:23 -00:01 | 16:54 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:57 | 04:57 -00:18 | 22:17 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 27:36 | 05:21 +00:16 | 27:14 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 33:13 | 05:18 -01:17 | 32:35 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 37:14 | 05:31 +00:07 | 37:53 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 42:52 | 04:49 -00:27 | 43:24 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 47:14 | 05:23 +00:17 | 48:13 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 52:54 | 02:12 -00:06 | 53:36 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 55:00 | 05:22 +00:17 | 55:48 -00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:45 | 01:00:39 | 05:06 +01:39 | 01:01:10 -00:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:40 | 01:07:24 | 05:59 +00:41 | 01:06:16 +01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:14:04 | 06:30 -01:19 | 01:12:15 +01:49 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:25:35 | 06:50 -00:23 | 01:25:35 |
Based on his splits analysis, Andy had a mixed performance in different segments of the race. His best running lap was 00:04:59, which was 00:31 slower than average. He performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where he was faster than the average by 00:13 and 00:35 respectively. However, he struggled in the Sandbag Lunges and Running 8 segments, where he was slower than average by 01:41 and 00:33 respectively. Overall, Andy seemed to have a better profile in the strength exercises rather than running.
In conclusion, while Andy Armour had a solid performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race, there are specific areas that he can focus on to further improve his performance. By addressing the identified areas of improvement, implementing specific training strategies, and applying effective race strategies, Andy can enhance his overall race performance and achieve better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fonsatti Martin | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:51 | |
| Wilke Alexander | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:04 | |
| Van De Goot Timo | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:13 | |
| Lazic Vladimir | 2024 London | 01:26:03 | |
| Albert Kai | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:17 | |
| Campana Filippo Leonardo | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:55 | |
| Klingler David | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:25:13 | |
| Frijters Martijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:03 | |
| Rainaldi Marco | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:47 | |
| Elbers Geert | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:25:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
