Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdonald Jacob's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdonald Jacob's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdonald Jacob's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdonald Jacob's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:53 | 50:47 to 43:54 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Mcdonald Jacob | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 05:15 | 04:31 -00:09 | 04:46 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 06:36 | 09:37 | 05:11 +01:25 | 09:17 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 16:13 | 03:05 -01:01 | 14:28 +01:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 18:17 | 05:40 -00:11 | 17:33 +00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 23:46 | 05:17 -01:09 | 23:13 +00:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:59 | 27:54 | 05:38 +01:21 | 28:30 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:28 | 34:53 | 05:51 -01:23 | 34:08 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 39:21 | 05:51 +01:28 | 39:59 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 46:40 | 04:56 -00:09 | 45:50 +00:50 |
| Running 6 | 06:47 | 51:27 | 05:41 +01:06 | 50:46 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 58:14 | 02:18 -00:19 | 56:27 +01:47 |
| Running 7 | 06:48 | 01:00:13 | 05:39 +01:09 | 58:45 +01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 01:07:01 | 05:31 -01:30 | 01:04:24 +02:37 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:11:02 | 06:23 -00:46 | 01:09:55 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:16:39 | 07:05 -00:38 | 01:16:18 +00:21 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:30:58 | 07:35 +00:26 | 01:30:58 |
Jacob Mcdonald ranked 303rd overall and 83rd in his age group, placing him in the top 44% and 53% respectively, which is a solid performance. His overall time was 01:30:58, with a total running time of 00:50:47, which was 05:33 slower than average. This indicates that Jacob has more of a strength-oriented profile, excelling in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges. However, there's a noticeable discrepancy in his running segments, especially after the initial running laps, suggesting that his pacing might have been too fast at the start, leading to fatigue in subsequent running segments. Areas like the Roxzone also showed room for improvement, indicating a need for better transitions and overall fitness.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccullagh Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:49 | |
| Felsman James | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:54 | |
| Williams Clint | 2023 London | 01:31:13 | |
| Gatnau Alvarez Daniel | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:29 | |
| Schmid Günther | 2022 Essen | 01:31:27 | |
| Sidorenko Nick | 2023 Milan | 01:30:38 | |
| Nguyen Brian | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:30:34 | |
| Pizzimenti Mike | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:30:46 | |
| Boston David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:12 | |
| Scala Ennio | 2024 Turin | 01:30:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
