Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 669 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Seckel Hugo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Seckel Hugo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Seckel Hugo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Seckel Hugo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:38 | 58:41 to 52:03 | 77.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 03:48 to 02:49 | 11.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:54 | 04:44 to 03:50 | 10.5% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:23 to 05:20 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:26 to 08:26 | 0.0% |
| Seckel Hugo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 05:28 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 06:16 | 04:48 -00:09 | 05:28 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 10:55 | 06:02 +00:01 | 10:16 +00:39 |
| Sled Push | 04:44 | 16:58 | 03:43 +01:01 | 16:18 +00:40 |
| Running 3 | 09:21 | 21:42 | 06:46 +02:35 | 20:01 +01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 05:41 | 31:03 | 06:34 -00:53 | 26:47 +04:16 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 36:44 | 06:45 -00:05 | 33:21 +03:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 43:24 | 07:39 -02:09 | 40:06 +03:18 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 48:54 | 07:06 -00:03 | 47:45 +01:09 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 55:57 | 05:22 +00:01 | 54:51 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 07:19 | 01:01:20 | 06:52 +00:27 | 01:00:13 +01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:48 | 01:08:39 | 02:44 +01:04 | 01:07:05 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:12:27 | 06:50 +00:14 | 01:09:49 +02:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:19:31 | 07:00 -01:20 | 01:16:39 +02:52 |
| Running 8 | 08:59 | 01:25:11 | 08:30 +00:29 | 01:23:39 +01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 08:26 | 01:34:10 | 09:10 -00:44 | 01:32:09 +02:01 |
| Roxzone | 09:04 | 01:51:33 | 10:14 -01:10 | 01:51:33 |
Hugo Seckel delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 65% overall and top 66% within his age group category. His overall time was 01:51:33. Hugo displayed strengths in multiple segments, notably outperforming in the Ski Erg, Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges. However, his total running time of 00:58:41 was 03:47 slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. His best running lap was 00:06:03, indicating potential in shorter distances. The analysis suggests Hugo has a more balanced profile, showing strengths in both strength and endurance activities but with room to improve his running efficiency and speed.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahn Stefan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:51:17 | |
| Morales Miguel | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:51:12 | |
| Augustat Lars | 2024 Hamburg | 01:51:52 | |
| To Chun Tung | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:51:18 | |
| Guyader Teddy | 2023 Paris | 01:51:34 | |
| Ren Ren | 2024 Singapore | 01:52:00 | |
| 남 경훈 | 2024 Incheon | 01:51:37 | |
| Corbishley Jamie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:51:25 | |
| Cliff Josh | 2024 Perth | 01:51:39 | |
| Mclaughlin Derek | 2022 Manchester | 01:51:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
