Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 746 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hibbett David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hibbett David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hibbett David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hibbett David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:18 | 56:55 to 51:37 | 81.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 05:20 to 04:50 | 7.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 04:14 to 03:48 | 6.7% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:34 to 05:19 | 3.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:00 to 06:00 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:20 to 07:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:24 to 08:24 | 0.0% |
| Hibbett David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:10 | 00:00 | 05:24 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 06:10 | 04:47 +00:33 | 05:24 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 11:30 | 06:01 +00:09 | 10:11 +01:19 |
| Sled Push | 04:14 | 17:40 | 03:42 +00:32 | 16:12 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:55 | 21:54 | 06:43 +01:12 | 19:54 +02:00 |
| Sled Pull | 06:00 | 29:49 | 06:33 -00:33 | 26:37 +03:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:55 | 35:49 | 06:41 +00:14 | 33:10 +02:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:20 | 42:44 | 07:35 -00:15 | 39:51 +02:53 |
| Running 5 | 07:30 | 50:04 | 06:59 +00:31 | 47:26 +02:38 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 57:34 | 05:21 +00:13 | 54:25 +03:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:47 | 01:03:08 | 06:44 +00:03 | 59:46 +03:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 01:09:55 | 02:46 -00:16 | 01:06:30 +03:25 |
| Running 7 | 07:24 | 01:12:25 | 06:50 +00:34 | 01:09:16 +03:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:19:49 | 07:02 -01:08 | 01:16:06 +03:43 |
| Running 8 | 08:07 | 01:25:43 | 08:18 -00:11 | 01:23:08 +02:35 |
| Wall Balls | 08:24 | 01:33:50 | 09:11 -00:47 | 01:31:26 +02:24 |
| Roxzone | 08:41 | 01:50:47 | 10:10 -01:29 | 01:50:47 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is evident that David struggled with the running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, and Running 7. He was consistently slower than the average time in these segments, indicating a need for improvement in his running endurance and speed. Additionally, his total running time was 04:42 slower than average, suggesting that he may benefit from focusing more on his running training.
In conclusion, David Hibbett had a solid performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. Focusing on improving his running endurance, speed, and overall fitness will contribute to enhanced performance. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to target these areas will help him achieve his goals in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ehrlich Mike | 2022 New York | 01:50:23 | |
| De Boer Marc | 2024 Maastricht | 01:50:29 | |
| Gholam Mohammad Reza | 2023 Hamburg | 01:50:58 | |
| Catananti Francesco Maria | 2024 Turin | 01:50:19 | |
| 윤 성륭 | 2024 Incheon | 01:50:51 | |
| Taillandier Wilfried | 2023 Paris | 01:50:22 | |
| Jacobo Robbie | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:50:48 | |
| Brucksch Johannes | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:51:01 | |
| Eannetta Damian | 2024 Dublin | 01:51:11 | |
| Peña Hernandez Juan Carlos | 2023 Malaga | 01:51:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
