Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 162 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Artz Denzel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Artz Denzel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Artz Denzel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Artz Denzel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 10:00 | 01:07:21 to 57:21 | 71.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:50 | 11:47 to 07:57 | 27.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:09 to 05:03 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:04 to 08:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:08 to 03:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:16 to 08:16 | 0.0% |
| Artz Denzel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:45 | 00:00 | 05:53 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 06:45 | 05:01 +00:08 | 05:53 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 07:01 | 11:54 | 06:36 +00:25 | 10:54 +01:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:37 | 18:55 | 04:23 -00:46 | 17:30 +01:25 |
| Running 3 | 07:58 | 22:32 | 07:40 +00:18 | 21:53 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 30:30 | 07:45 -01:31 | 29:33 +00:57 |
| Running 4 | 10:27 | 36:44 | 07:45 +02:42 | 37:18 -00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:04 | 47:11 | 09:25 -01:21 | 45:03 +02:08 |
| Running 5 | 07:24 | 55:15 | 08:13 -00:49 | 54:28 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 01:02:39 | 05:42 -00:24 | 01:02:41 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 08:48 | 01:07:57 | 07:55 +00:53 | 01:08:23 -00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 01:16:45 | 03:09 -00:01 | 01:16:18 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 08:02 | 01:19:53 | 07:58 +00:04 | 01:19:27 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:47 | 01:27:55 | 08:51 +02:56 | 01:27:25 +00:30 |
| Running 8 | 11:00 | 01:39:42 | 10:55 +00:05 | 01:36:16 +03:26 |
| Wall Balls | 08:16 | 01:50:42 | 11:32 -03:16 | 01:47:11 +03:31 |
| Roxzone | 12:20 | 02:11:09 | 12:26 -00:06 | 02:11:09 |
Denzel's total running time of 01:07:21 was 05:47 slower than the average finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:06:45 indicates that he has the potential to increase his running speed and endurance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques, Denzel Artz can improve his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to focus on both his running speed and endurance, as well as his overall fitness and transition times. With consistent training and attention to these areas of improvement, Denzel can continue to progress and achieve better results in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chaudhuri Ushnish | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:10:41 | |
| Bright Mark | 2024 London | 02:10:42 | |
| Juricek Erik | 2023 Birmingham | 02:10:43 | |
| Kusumadi Sugiharto | 2023 Singapore | 02:11:29 | |
| Moncer Anthony | 2024 Paris | 02:10:42 | |
| Van De Vaart Bo | 2023 Amsterdam | 02:11:38 | |
| Cajigas Lopez Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:10:47 | |
| Ventre Michael | 2022 London | 02:10:39 | |
| Missaoui Karim | 2024 Marseille | 02:11:01 | |
| Deitz Ben | 2024 Sydney | 02:11:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Paris | 02:23:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
