Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 990 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:27 (From 09:51 to 06:24) | 53.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:18 (From 09:40 to 08:22) | 20.2% |
| BBJ | 01:09 (From 08:05 to 06:56) | 17.9% |
| Rowing | 00:32 (From 05:45 to 05:13) | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:37 to 04:37) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:42 to 02:42) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:12 to 05:12) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:07 to 02:07) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 46:26 to 46:26) | 0.0% |
| Gregory Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:32 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:32 | 04:43 -00:06 | 05:17 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 10:09 | 05:47 -00:52 | 10:00 +00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 15:04 | 03:39 -00:57 | 15:47 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 17:46 | 06:26 -00:50 | 19:26 -01:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 23:22 | 06:16 -01:04 | 25:52 -02:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 28:34 | 06:24 -00:41 | 32:08 -03:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:05 | 34:17 | 07:04 +01:01 | 38:32 -04:15 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 42:22 | 06:40 -00:35 | 45:36 -03:14 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 48:27 | 05:14 +00:31 | 52:16 -03:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 54:12 | 06:29 -00:35 | 57:30 -03:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:00:06 | 02:37 -00:30 | 01:03:59 -03:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:02:13 | 06:28 -00:53 | 01:06:36 -04:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:51 | 01:07:48 | 06:36 +03:15 | 01:13:04 -05:16 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:17:39 | 07:45 -00:35 | 01:19:40 -02:01 |
| Wall Balls | 09:40 | 01:24:49 | 08:38 +01:02 | 01:27:25 -02:36 |
| Roxzone | 11:00 | 01:45:21 | 09:18 +01:42 | 01:45:21 |
Mark Gregory's performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox event showed a strong running capability, as evidenced by his total running time of 00:46:26, which was 05:12 faster than the average. This suggests that Mark has a runner profile and would benefit from focusing more on strength training to balance his overall performance. Despite a solid pace in the middle running segments, his running 1 split was slightly slower, indicating a cautious start, possibly to conserve energy for later stages. His overall rank was 411 out of 688, placing him in the top 59%, and his age group rank was 104 out of 156, placing him in the top 66%. This indicates room for improvement, particularly in non-running segments, where he lost significant time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kezic Mario | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:45:04 | |
| Fischer Nicolas | 2024 Paris | 01:45:47 | |
| Piech Michał | 2024 Katowice | 01:45:17 | |
| Kong Isaac | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:06 | |
| Baker Mark | 2023 London | 01:45:16 | |
| Fuchs Daniel | 2023 München | 01:45:11 | |
| Hoffmann Alexander | 2024 Taipei | 01:45:42 | |
| Reiser Max | 2024 Glasgow | 01:45:16 | |
| Tsai Chunyen | 2024 Taipei | 01:45:44 | |
| Prins Auke | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London Gregory Mark, Mackenzie Iain | 01:12:54 | |
| 2024 London Gregory Mark, Jeffrey Alex | 01:13:28 | |
| 2023 London Gregory Mark, Parkhouse Paul | 01:12:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Gregory Mark
