Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Everingham Sam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Everingham Sam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Everingham Sam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Everingham Sam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:06 | 08:16 to 06:10 | 55.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:53 | 04:07 to 03:14 | 23.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:33 | 07:57 to 07:24 | 14.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 05:48 to 05:31 | 7.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:19 to 45:19 | 0.0% |
| Everingham Sam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:28 | 04:38 -00:13 | 05:00 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 09:53 | 05:27 -00:37 | 09:38 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 14:43 | 03:18 +00:49 | 15:05 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 18:50 | 05:58 -00:41 | 18:23 +00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 24:07 | 05:41 +00:07 | 24:21 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:44 | 29:55 | 05:57 -00:13 | 30:02 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:16 | 35:39 | 06:24 +01:52 | 35:59 -00:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 43:55 | 06:13 -00:08 | 42:23 +01:32 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 50:00 | 05:04 -00:12 | 48:36 +01:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 54:52 | 06:01 -00:19 | 53:40 +01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:00:34 | 02:26 -00:11 | 59:41 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 01:02:49 | 06:01 -00:16 | 01:02:07 +00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:35 | 01:08:34 | 05:59 -00:24 | 01:08:08 +00:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:14:09 | 06:59 -00:29 | 01:14:07 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:57 | 01:20:39 | 07:49 +00:08 | 01:21:06 -00:27 |
| Roxzone | 08:42 | 01:37:11 | 08:16 +00:26 | 01:37:11 |
Sam Everingham showed commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. As per the provided data, Sam finished in the top 50% of all athletes and within the top 55% in his age group (35-39). His overall time of 01:37:11, a commendable feat, demonstrates his endurance and fitness.
Interestingly, Sam's total running time was 00:45:19, which is 02:31 faster than the average. This indicates that Sam showcases a more runner profile, excelling in running segments consistently with a best lap time of 00:04:50. However, it is worth noting that his initial run was slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from a quicker start out of the gate.
To improve future race performances, Sam should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mikniche Hadrian | 2022 London | 01:36:41 | |
| Werner Peter | 2023 München | 01:37:18 | |
| Lombardi Karl | 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:29 | |
| Boll Frederic | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:34 | |
| Fahy Stephen | 2024 London | 01:37:32 | |
| Hinz Tobias | 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:56 | |
| Hernández Dunne Borja | 2022 Madrid | 01:37:29 | |
| Cuno Hans | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:37:02 | |
| Neuteboom Victor | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:57 | |
| Chiarella Emmanuel | 2022 Valencia | 01:37:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
