Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Broadhurst Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Broadhurst Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Broadhurst Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Broadhurst Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:24 | 06:32 to 05:08 | 36.1% |
| Run Total | 01:24 | 45:19 to 43:55 | 36.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:36 to 02:04 | 13.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:29 | 05:58 to 05:29 | 12.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:29 to 02:27 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:14 to 05:12 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Broadhurst Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 05:01 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 05:28 | 05:03 -00:09 | 05:01 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 10:22 | 05:21 -00:02 | 10:04 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 15:41 | 02:39 -00:10 | 15:25 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 18:10 | 05:37 -00:03 | 18:04 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 06:32 | 23:44 | 05:35 +00:57 | 23:41 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 30:16 | 05:40 +00:07 | 29:16 +01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:58 | 36:03 | 05:51 +00:07 | 34:56 +01:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 42:01 | 05:48 +00:04 | 40:47 +01:14 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 47:53 | 05:19 -00:05 | 46:35 +01:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 53:07 | 05:43 +00:00 | 51:54 +01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 58:50 | 02:11 +00:25 | 57:37 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 01:01:26 | 05:41 -00:09 | 59:48 +01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:41 | 01:06:58 | 04:37 -00:56 | 01:05:29 +01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:10:39 | 06:03 +00:05 | 01:10:06 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:16:47 | 04:45 -00:46 | 01:16:09 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 06:54 | 01:27:31 | 06:37 +00:17 | 01:27:31 |
When analyzing her splits, it is evident that Amy's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 00:45:19, which was 01:30 slower than the average. However, it is worth noting that her best running lap was 00:05:19, indicating that she had the capability to perform at a faster pace.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Amy can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bak Joanna | 2024 New York | 01:27:32 | |
| Campbell Aimee | 2024 Stockholm | 01:27:23 | |
| Wainwright Lara | 2023 Birmingham | 01:27:43 | |
| Alba Priscila | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:27:05 | |
| Murua Garcia Irati | 2023 Bilbao | 01:27:19 | |
| Burns Suzanne | 2023 Malaga | 01:27:11 | |
| Slater Caroline | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:35 | |
| Jones Charlotte | 2024 London | 01:27:35 | |
| Kuc Nadine | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:48 | |
| Hillier Shelly | 2023 London | 01:27:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
