Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Abernethy James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Abernethy James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Abernethy James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Abernethy James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 47:04 to 44:06 | 74.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 05:37 to 05:04 | 13.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:10 to 02:58 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:40 to 04:30 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:18 to 02:13 | 2.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Abernethy James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:03 | 00:00 | 04:49 +01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 06:03 | 04:32 +00:08 | 04:49 +01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 10:43 | 05:12 +00:21 | 09:21 +01:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 16:16 | 03:05 +00:05 | 14:33 +01:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 19:26 | 05:41 -00:02 | 17:38 +01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:37 | 25:05 | 05:17 +00:20 | 23:19 +01:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 30:42 | 05:39 +00:08 | 28:36 +02:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 36:29 | 05:52 -01:20 | 34:15 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 41:01 | 05:52 -00:01 | 40:07 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 46:52 | 04:56 -00:08 | 45:59 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 51:40 | 05:41 +00:13 | 50:55 +00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 57:34 | 02:18 +00:00 | 56:36 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 59:52 | 05:40 +00:08 | 58:54 +00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 01:05:40 | 05:32 -00:41 | 01:04:34 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:10:31 | 06:24 +00:08 | 01:10:06 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:17:03 | 07:07 -01:06 | 01:16:30 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:14 | 01:31:10 | 07:33 +00:41 | 01:31:10 |
It is worth noting that James' total running time of 00:47:04 was 03:34 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to reduce the time spent in the roxzone and increase his running performance.
Overall, James Abernethy showed promise in the 2022 Birmingham Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and incorporating specific training strategies, he can enhance his performance in future races. With targeted training and a strategic race approach, James has the potential to achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kreutz Dominik | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:46 | |
| Meehan Andrew | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:21 | |
| Heineke Jörn | 2022 Hamburg | 01:30:52 | |
| Zergon André | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:31:11 | |
| Alberdi Padrones Unai | 2021 Madrid | 01:31:07 | |
| Brown Sean | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:52 | |
| Salinas Alan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:31:19 | |
| Peich Philipp | 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:15 | |
| Wooding Matthew | 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:00 | |
| Indset Tor Inge | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:25:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
