Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rennie Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rennie Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rennie Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rennie Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:31 | 38:18 to 36:47 | 30.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 05:10 to 03:56 | 25.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:57 | 04:56 to 03:59 | 19.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 05:29 to 04:55 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:40 to 04:27 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:20 to 04:09 | 3.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 03:59 to 03:50 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:50 to 01:43 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Rennie Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:19 | 00:00 | 04:13 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:19 | 04:17 +00:03 | 04:13 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 07:39 | 04:29 +00:27 | 08:30 -00:51 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 12:35 | 02:34 -00:24 | 12:59 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 14:45 | 04:51 +00:08 | 15:33 -00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 19:44 | 04:16 -00:17 | 20:24 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 23:43 | 04:49 +00:15 | 24:40 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:10 | 28:47 | 04:24 +00:46 | 29:29 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 33:57 | 04:56 +00:13 | 33:53 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 39:06 | 04:34 +00:06 | 38:49 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 43:46 | 04:51 +00:01 | 43:23 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 48:38 | 01:56 -00:06 | 48:14 +00:24 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 50:28 | 04:49 -00:05 | 50:10 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 55:12 | 04:23 +00:33 | 54:59 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:00:08 | 05:13 +00:05 | 59:22 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:05:26 | 05:28 +00:01 | 01:04:35 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:15:37 | 05:34 -00:43 | 01:15:37 |
Stephen Rennie's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, securing an overall rank of 453 out of 3118 athletes, placing him in the top 14%. Within his age group (45-49), he ranked 18th, which is in the top 7% of 236 athletes. His overall time was 01:15:37. Notably, Stephen's total running time was 00:38:18, making him a stronger runner compared to the average, as he was 00:16 faster. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:44. However, his initial running segments suggest he started too fast, as his performance declined in the subsequent running splits. This indicates that although running is a strength, pacing and endurance need to be managed better throughout the race. Overall, he exhibits a stronger runner profile but needs to focus on enhancing his strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Köhn Hans Werner | 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:07 | |
| Ashley Connor | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:36 | |
| Cutt Neil | 2023 London | 01:15:41 | |
| Hill Nik | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:08 | |
| Durkin Alan | 2024 Dublin | 01:15:41 | |
| Crisafulli Adam | 2021 New York | 01:15:46 | |
| Lukas Frank | 2018 Leipzig | 01:16:05 | |
| Hickey Kyle | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:29 | |
| Osyf James | 2024 New York | 01:15:30 | |
| Watters Michael | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
