Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcreynolds Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcreynolds Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcreynolds Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcreynolds Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:22 | 46:20 to 39:58 | 91.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:33 to 04:18 | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:43 to 02:32 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:47 to 04:38 | 2.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:11 to 03:11 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Mcreynolds Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:09 | 00:00 | 04:29 +02:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 07:09 | 04:23 +00:10 | 04:29 +02:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 11:42 | 04:47 +00:26 | 08:52 +02:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 16:55 | 02:46 -00:03 | 13:39 +03:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 19:38 | 05:11 +00:41 | 16:25 +03:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 25:30 | 04:40 -00:17 | 21:36 +03:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 29:53 | 05:09 +00:31 | 26:16 +03:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:11 | 35:33 | 04:58 -01:47 | 31:25 +04:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 38:44 | 05:19 +00:14 | 36:23 +02:21 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 44:17 | 04:44 +00:03 | 41:42 +02:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 49:04 | 05:12 +00:37 | 46:26 +02:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 54:53 | 02:06 -00:18 | 51:38 +03:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 56:41 | 05:09 +00:14 | 53:44 +02:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:50 | 01:02:04 | 04:51 -01:01 | 58:53 +03:11 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:05:54 | 05:41 +00:04 | 01:03:44 +02:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:34 | 01:11:39 | 06:08 -00:34 | 01:09:25 +02:14 |
| Roxzone | 04:48 | 01:21:52 | 06:19 -01:31 | 01:21:52 |
In terms of his overall time, Matthew completed the race in 01:21:52. His total running time was 00:46:20, which was 06:48 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the "roxzone" and improve his overall performance.
It is worth noting that Matthew's best running lap was 00:05:13, which suggests that he has a solid running ability and should focus on capitalizing on this strength.
To improve his performance in Running 1, Running 3, Running 6, Running 4, Running 2, Running 5, and Running 7, Matthew should focus on improving his running endurance and speed. Specific training strategies for these areas could include interval training, tempo runs, hill repeats, and fartlek training. Incorporating these exercises into his training routine will help him improve his overall running performance and reduce the time lost in these segments.
For the Ski Erg segment, Matthew should work on improving his technique and efficiency on the machine. He can do this by practicing proper form and using his legs and core muscles to generate power. Incorporating Ski Erg intervals into his training routine will help him improve his speed and performance in this segment.
In terms of his profile, Matthew seems to have a better running ability compared to strength exercises. Therefore, he should continue to prioritize his running training to maintain and improve his running performance. However, he should also incorporate strength training exercises to enhance his overall fitness and improve his performance in the strength-focused segments.
To further enhance his race performance, Matthew should consider incorporating cross-training activities such as swimming or cycling to improve his cardiovascular fitness and reduce the risk of overuse injuries. Additionally, focusing on proper nutrition and hydration before, during, and after the race will help him maintain optimal performance and recovery.
Overall, with targeted training and a strategic race approach, Matthew McReynolds has the potential to further improve his performance in future Hyrox races. By focusing on his running endurance, improving his transition time, and maintaining a balanced training routine, he can continue to climb up the ranks and achieve his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Everdink Richard | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:15 | |
| Milanesio Luca | 2023 Milan | 01:21:54 | |
| Mcdonald Marcus | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:09 | |
| Mehren Marcel | 2023 München | 01:22:00 | |
| Clements Jack | 2024 London | 01:22:08 | |
| Eletskikh Maxim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:12 | |
| Siems Jacob | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:55 | |
| Holland Ben | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:21:22 | |
| Heil Hans | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:21:47 | |
| Perillo Salvatore | 2024 Milan | 01:22:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:16:38 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:25:03 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:28:16 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:27:18 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:33:01 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:26:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
