Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Basel using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Liso Maria Cristina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Liso Maria Cristina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Liso Maria Cristina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Liso Maria Cristina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:21 | 44:51 to 40:30 | 90.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:29 to 02:09 | 6.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:01 to 01:53 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| De Liso Maria Cristina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 04:10 | 04:56 -00:12 | 04:40 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 08:54 | 05:02 -00:11 | 09:36 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 13:45 | 02:31 -00:02 | 14:38 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 02:49 | 16:14 | 05:18 -02:29 | 17:09 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 19:03 | 05:06 -00:33 | 22:27 -03:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 23:36 | 05:19 -00:06 | 27:33 -03:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:23 | 28:49 | 05:14 -00:51 | 32:52 -04:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:13 | 33:12 | 05:25 -00:12 | 38:06 -04:54 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 38:25 | 05:10 -00:13 | 43:31 -05:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 43:22 | 05:20 -00:09 | 48:41 -05:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 48:33 | 02:04 -00:03 | 54:01 -05:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 50:34 | 05:18 -00:14 | 56:05 -05:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:45 | 55:38 | 04:12 -00:27 | 01:01:23 -05:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 59:23 | 05:35 -00:12 | 01:05:35 -06:12 |
| Wall Balls | 02:48 | 01:04:46 | 04:15 -01:27 | 01:11:10 -06:24 |
| Roxzone | 13:51 | 01:21:17 | 05:52 +07:59 | 01:21:17 |
In terms of her overall pacing, Maria Cristina De Liso seemed to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race. However, her total running time of 00:44:51 was 04:19 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she may need to focus on improving her running ability and endurance.
In conclusion, Maria Cristina De Liso had a strong performance in the 2022 Basel Hyrox race. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her running ability and endurance, particularly in the segments where she lost the most time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and efficient transitions, Maria Cristina De Liso can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lemp Katja | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:21:06 | |
| Byrne Christie | 2023 Paris | 01:21:03 | |
| Oconnor Zelie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:17 | |
| Ferdinando Amy | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:35 | |
| Baxter Josie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:12 | |
| Ryan Erica | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:41 | |
| Wagenhofer Rebecca | 2022 München | 01:21:42 | |
| Fougeyrollas Manon | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:40 | |
| Samata Vanessa | 2024 Perth | 01:21:44 | |
| Goldman Jamie | 2021 Chicago | 01:21:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Milan | 01:25:56 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:22:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
