Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heijting Emiel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heijting Emiel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heijting Emiel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heijting Emiel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:07 | 36:38 to 35:31 | 31.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:54 | 04:33 to 03:39 | 25.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 04:25 to 03:37 | 22.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:23 to 02:05 | 8.4% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:32 to 04:23 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:13 to 04:05 | 3.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 04:45 to 04:38 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:41 to 01:38 | 1.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Heijting Emiel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:05 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:36 | 04:14 -00:01 | 04:05 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:00 | 07:49 | 04:23 -00:23 | 08:19 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 11:49 | 02:30 -00:07 | 12:42 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 14:12 | 04:42 +00:10 | 15:12 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 19:04 | 04:07 +00:18 | 19:54 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 23:29 | 04:40 +00:07 | 24:01 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 28:16 | 04:12 +00:21 | 28:41 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 04:46 | 32:49 | 04:48 -00:02 | 32:53 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 37:35 | 04:31 +00:01 | 37:41 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:37 | 42:07 | 04:42 -00:05 | 42:12 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 46:44 | 01:52 -00:11 | 46:54 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 48:25 | 04:41 +00:00 | 48:46 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 53:06 | 04:11 -00:28 | 53:27 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 56:49 | 05:02 +00:20 | 57:38 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 04:45 | 01:02:11 | 05:17 -00:32 | 01:02:40 -00:29 |
| Roxzone | 06:25 | 01:13:13 | 05:16 +01:09 | 01:13:13 |
In terms of overall time, Emiel completed the race in 01:13:13. His total running time was 00:36:38, which was 00:26 slower than the average time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance. Additionally, his best running lap was completed in 00:03:36, which was 00:23 faster than the average time.
In conclusion, Emiel Heijting performed exceptionally well in the Hyrox race in Amsterdam. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running performance, particularly in segments such as the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 8. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as HIIT, strength training, and interval training, can help him enhance his overall fitness, speed, and endurance. Additionally, optimizing transition efficiency and mental preparation will contribute to improved race performance. With dedicated training and implementation of these strategies, Emiel has the potential to further excel in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MarignaleAnastase Grégory | 2024 Marseille | 01:13:02 | |
| Oppermann Niklas | 2024 Malaga | 01:13:30 | |
| Horner Robert Anthony | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:20 | |
| Dechesne Sebastian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:12:46 | |
| Webb Dustin | 2023 Dallas | 01:12:43 | |
| Dowson Josh | 2023 Malaga | 01:12:59 | |
| Seymour Richard | 2023 Glasgow | 01:13:35 | |
| Raes Tobias | 2024 Maastricht | 01:13:15 | |
| Degrolard Maxence | 2024 Paris | 01:13:02 | |
| Alves David | 2024 Berlin | 01:13:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:15:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
