Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hagberg Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hagberg Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hagberg Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hagberg Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:53 | 05:13 to 03:20 | 29.0% |
| Run Total | 01:50 | 49:19 to 47:29 | 28.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 07:24 to 06:23 | 15.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:00 | 06:41 to 05:41 | 15.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:55 to 02:28 | 6.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 06:16 to 05:57 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:05 to 06:05 | 0.0% |
| Hagberg Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:40 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 05:40 | 04:39 -00:09 | 05:03 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 10:10 | 05:34 +00:16 | 09:42 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 05:13 | 16:00 | 03:25 +01:48 | 15:16 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 21:13 | 06:06 +00:06 | 18:41 +02:32 |
| Sled Pull | 06:41 | 27:25 | 05:50 +00:51 | 24:47 +02:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:22 | 34:06 | 06:04 +00:18 | 30:37 +03:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:24 | 40:28 | 06:35 +00:49 | 36:41 +03:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 47:52 | 06:20 -00:14 | 43:16 +04:36 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 53:58 | 05:07 -00:07 | 49:36 +04:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 58:58 | 06:09 -00:27 | 54:43 +04:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 01:04:40 | 02:31 +00:24 | 01:00:52 +03:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:07:35 | 06:08 +00:05 | 01:03:23 +04:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:16 | 01:13:48 | 06:13 +00:03 | 01:09:31 +04:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:20:04 | 07:09 +00:08 | 01:15:44 +04:20 |
| Wall Balls | 06:05 | 01:27:21 | 07:55 -01:50 | 01:22:53 +04:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:03 | 01:39:23 | 08:35 -02:32 | 01:39:23 |
Daniel Hagberg performed well in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 37% of 613 athletes overall. His rank in the 25-29 age group was also in the top 36% of 90 athletes. His overall time of 01:39:23 was respectable, but there is room for improvement in certain areas.
In terms of his profile, Daniel's total running time of 00:49:19 was 03:13 slower than the average. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:40 suggests that he has the potential to improve his running performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Daniel can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Consistent training and a targeted approach to addressing weaknesses will help him achieve his goals and further improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shone Lee | 2024 London | 01:39:45 | |
| Doe Luke | 2024 London | 01:39:33 | |
| Cunningham Scott | 2024 Glasgow | 01:39:13 | |
| Camilleri Dirk | 2023 Milan | 01:38:59 | |
| Moorcroft Josh | 2024 Manchester | 01:39:15 | |
| Freitag Alexander | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:39:12 | |
| Mcdowell Gareth | 2023 Dublin | 01:39:46 | |
| Been Nick | 2024 Maastricht | 01:38:58 | |
| Knirsch Calvin | 2019 Hannover | 01:38:55 | |
| Harris Greg | 2023 Melbourne | 01:39:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
