Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haase Maik's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haase Maik's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haase Maik's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haase Maik's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:45 | 09:57 to 07:12 | 60.2% |
| Run Total | 01:36 | 47:28 to 45:52 | 35.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:17 to 03:09 | 2.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 05:28 to 05:23 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Haase Maik | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:29 | 04:35 -00:10 | 04:58 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 09:54 | 05:24 -00:15 | 09:33 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 15:03 | 03:12 +00:05 | 14:57 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 18:20 | 05:50 -00:17 | 18:09 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:28 | 23:53 | 05:31 -00:03 | 23:59 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 29:21 | 05:51 -00:17 | 29:30 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 34:55 | 06:15 -00:59 | 35:21 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 40:11 | 06:05 -00:20 | 41:36 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 45:56 | 05:02 -00:04 | 47:41 -01:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 50:54 | 05:54 -00:15 | 52:43 -01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 56:33 | 02:25 -00:22 | 58:37 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 58:36 | 05:53 -00:20 | 01:01:02 -02:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:34 | 01:04:09 | 05:52 -00:18 | 01:06:55 -02:46 |
| Running 8 | 08:49 | 01:09:43 | 06:49 +02:00 | 01:12:47 -03:04 |
| Wall Balls | 09:57 | 01:18:32 | 07:32 +02:25 | 01:19:36 -01:04 |
| Roxzone | 06:50 | 01:35:13 | 08:05 -01:15 | 01:35:13 |
Looking at the splits analysis, Haase had a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. His best running lap was 00:05:09, showing his potential as a runner. However, he struggled in some segments, particularly Running 1, Wall Balls, and Running 8, where he lost significant time compared to the average. It is worth noting that his pacing throughout the race was generally good, with consistent splits and no major fluctuations.
Additionally, Haase can benefit from implementing a pacing strategy, aiming to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race. This will help him avoid burnout and optimize his performance. He should also prioritize recovery between exercises to minimize the time spent in the roxzone and ensure a smooth transition.
Incorporating these strategies, along with the specific training recommendations mentioned above, can help Maik Haase improve his performance in future HYROX races and enhance his overall fitness level.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Buchanan Lee | 2023 Dublin | 01:35:40 | |
| Wretling Urban | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:52 | |
| Guerra Gonzalo | 2024 Singapore | 01:35:29 | |
| Amkoum Chafik | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:35:01 | |
| Mone Philip | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:58 | |
| Harrington Dustin | 2023 Chicago | 01:35:23 | |
| Ferger Michael | 2024 Berlin | 01:35:07 | |
| Ignacio Ray | 2021 Chicago | 01:34:59 | |
| Stolker Tim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:58 | |
| Wilkes Nick | 2023 Dublin | 01:35:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
