Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fritschij Samanta's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fritschij Samanta's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fritschij Samanta's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fritschij Samanta's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 22:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 21:58 | 01:07:29 to 45:31 | 98.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:45 to 02:36 | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:15 to 02:09 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Fritschij Samanta | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:43 | 05:09 -00:27 | 05:10 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 07:57 | 09:25 | 05:32 +02:25 | 10:19 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 17:22 | 02:47 -00:02 | 15:51 +01:31 |
| Running 3 | 08:04 | 20:07 | 05:51 +02:13 | 18:38 +01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 28:11 | 05:52 -01:08 | 24:29 +03:42 |
| Running 4 | 08:10 | 32:55 | 05:52 +02:18 | 30:21 +02:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:32 | 41:05 | 06:13 -00:41 | 36:13 +04:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 46:37 | 06:01 +00:04 | 42:26 +04:11 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 52:42 | 05:25 -00:08 | 48:27 +04:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 57:59 | 05:54 -00:19 | 53:52 +04:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:03:34 | 02:16 -00:01 | 59:46 +03:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 01:05:49 | 05:53 -00:08 | 01:02:02 +03:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:28 | 01:11:34 | 04:53 -01:25 | 01:07:55 +03:39 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:15:02 | 06:18 -00:04 | 01:12:48 +02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 03:12 | 01:21:16 | 05:00 -01:48 | 01:19:06 +02:10 |
| Roxzone | 06:45 | 01:31:06 | 07:00 -00:15 | 01:31:06 |
Based on the splits analysis, Samanta performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, being 18 seconds and 24 seconds faster than the average, respectively. However, she struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Roxzone segments, where she was significantly slower than the average.
In conclusion, Samanta Fritschij had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, with notable strengths in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments. However, there is room for improvement in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Roxzone segments. By implementing the suggested training strategies, focusing on pacing, and incorporating specific exercises and drills, Samanta can enhance her performance in these areas and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Joanne Zoë | 2022 Maastricht | 01:31:09 | |
| Priemer Maike | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:30:44 | |
| Malone Claire | 2024 Malaga | 01:31:13 | |
| Watson Analise | 2022 Dallas | 01:31:01 | |
| D' Aguanno Isabella | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:15 | |
| Hehr Franciska | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:30:59 | |
| Knott Holly | 2022 Maastricht | 01:30:56 | |
| Henn Sabrina | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:31:33 | |
| Haidu Jennifer | 2022 Chicago | 01:31:15 | |
| Bellout Nadia | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:31:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
