Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nichols Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nichols Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nichols Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nichols Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:12 | 49:41 to 42:29 | 89.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:53 | 02:59 to 02:06 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Nichols Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:05 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:05 | 04:29 -00:27 | 04:41 -01:36 |
| Running 2 | 06:34 | 07:07 | 05:03 +01:31 | 09:10 -02:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 13:41 | 02:58 -00:14 | 14:13 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 10:30 | 16:25 | 05:30 +05:00 | 17:11 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 26:55 | 05:03 -00:26 | 22:41 +04:14 |
| Running 4 | 07:12 | 31:32 | 05:29 +01:43 | 27:44 +03:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 38:44 | 05:31 -00:42 | 33:13 +05:31 |
| Running 5 | 07:23 | 43:33 | 05:40 +01:43 | 38:44 +04:49 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 50:56 | 04:52 -00:17 | 44:24 +06:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:01 | 55:31 | 05:31 -00:30 | 49:16 +06:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 01:00:32 | 02:13 +00:46 | 54:47 +05:45 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 01:03:31 | 05:30 -00:38 | 57:00 +06:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:08:23 | 05:15 -00:50 | 01:02:30 +05:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 01:12:48 | 06:09 -01:01 | 01:07:45 +05:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:17:56 | 06:44 -00:53 | 01:13:54 +04:02 |
| Roxzone | 04:01 | 01:27:40 | 07:02 -03:01 | 01:27:40 |
Matt Nichols, competing in the HYROX category for the 30-34 age group, demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester event. Despite placing in the top 68% overall and the top 75% within his age group, there are notable areas for improvement and potential growth.
On analyzing his performance, it is evident that he has a stronger inclination towards strength exercises, as indicated by his total running time being slower than average. His pacing also appears to be an area of concern, as he started off faster than average but gradually slowed down, specifically from Running 2 to Running 5. This may indicate that he started off too fast and could not maintain the pace throughout the race.
To improve his overall performance, Matt should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Greve Michael | 2024 New York | 01:28:05 | |
| Kelly Gary | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:10 | |
| Teruggia Simone | 2023 Milan | 01:27:29 | |
| Dion Alan | 2024 London | 01:27:22 | |
| Vera Omar | 2024 Mexico City | 01:27:23 | |
| Olejnizak Simon | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:27:32 | |
| Gnyla Rob | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:51 | |
| Gomez Rubio Juan Felix | 2023 Bilbao | 01:27:26 | |
| Guzzi Gianluigi | 2024 Turin | 01:28:01 | |
| Dominguez Michael | 2024 London | 01:27:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
