Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Manila Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Manila Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Manila Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Manila Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:22 | 04:09 to 02:47 | 29.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 03:04 to 02:05 | 21.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:57 | 07:11 to 06:14 | 20.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:23 to 04:45 | 13.5% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:09 to 04:46 | 8.2% |
| Run Total | 00:22 | 42:41 to 42:19 | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Manila Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:01 | 04:28 -00:19 | 04:42 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:10 | 05:02 -00:25 | 09:10 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 04:09 | 13:47 | 02:57 +01:12 | 14:12 -00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 17:56 | 05:28 -00:06 | 17:09 +00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 23:18 | 05:02 +00:21 | 22:37 +00:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 28:41 | 05:28 -00:26 | 27:39 +01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 33:43 | 05:26 -01:02 | 33:07 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 38:07 | 05:39 -00:23 | 38:33 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 43:23 | 04:51 +00:18 | 44:12 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 48:32 | 05:30 -00:22 | 49:03 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:04 | 53:40 | 02:13 +00:51 | 54:33 -00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 56:44 | 05:28 +00:04 | 56:46 -00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 01:02:16 | 05:13 -00:26 | 01:02:14 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:07:03 | 06:07 +00:38 | 01:07:27 -00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:13:48 | 06:39 +00:32 | 01:13:34 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:27:14 | 07:01 -00:39 | 01:27:14 |
When analyzing his splits, it is clear that Anthony's strength lies in the running segments. His total running time of 00:42:41 is 00:53 slower than the average for his finish time, indicating that he could improve his overall fitness and transition time. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:37 is impressive, showing that he has the potential to excel in running.
Overall, Anthony Manila had a strong performance in the 2021 Dallas Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and targeting specific areas of weakness, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Buckross Danny | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:40 | |
| Keetz Jon | 2023 Anaheim | 01:26:45 | |
| Febus Guido | 2024 Maastricht | 01:27:27 | |
| Mollen Timo | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:27:02 | |
| Grabmeier Stephan | 2023 Köln | 01:27:37 | |
| Singh Bikram | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:46 | |
| Petronelli Paolo | 2024 Rimini | 01:27:00 | |
| Welter Hugo | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:08 | |
| Yuan Ryan | 2024 Anaheim | 01:27:22 | |
| Robinson Brandon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:27:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:17:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
