Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gannon Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gannon Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gannon Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gannon Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:21 | 08:46 to 06:25 | 47.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:20 | 06:13 to 04:53 | 26.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 02:59 to 02:08 | 17.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 03:07 to 02:51 | 5.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:57 to 04:49 | 2.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 05:09 to 05:05 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:37 to 41:37 | 0.0% |
| Gannon Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:44 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 03:34 | 04:29 -00:13 | 04:44 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 07:50 | 05:06 -00:04 | 09:13 -01:23 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 12:52 | 02:59 +00:08 | 14:19 -01:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 15:59 | 05:33 +00:03 | 17:18 -01:19 |
| Sled Pull | 06:13 | 21:35 | 05:06 +01:07 | 22:51 -01:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 27:48 | 05:32 -00:06 | 27:57 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 33:14 | 05:37 -00:48 | 33:29 -00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 38:03 | 05:43 -00:10 | 39:06 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 43:36 | 04:53 +00:04 | 44:49 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 48:33 | 05:34 -00:13 | 49:42 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 53:54 | 02:15 +00:44 | 55:16 -01:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 56:53 | 05:33 -00:21 | 57:31 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 01:02:05 | 05:21 -00:12 | 01:03:04 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:07:14 | 06:14 -00:17 | 01:08:25 -01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 08:46 | 01:13:11 | 06:47 +01:59 | 01:14:39 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:28:39 | 07:13 -00:22 | 01:28:39 |
Mark Gannon's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race was commendable, with a strong finish in the top 40% overall and the top 37% in his age group. His total running time was notably 2:49 faster than the average, showcasing his strong running capabilities. This indicates that Mark has a runner's profile, suggesting a need to focus more on strength training to balance his performance. His fast start, particularly in Running 1, highlights his potential to maintain a competitive pace. However, managing energy distribution across the race will be crucial to avoid early fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jerent Stevens | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:18 | |
| Roberts James | 2023 Stockholm | 01:28:09 | |
| Whoriskey Jason | 2023 Dublin | 01:28:27 | |
| Verdavaine Frédéric | 2024 Köln | 01:28:46 | |
| Wade Jamie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:28:47 | |
| Chiho Ko | 2023 Singapore | 01:29:04 | |
| Peach Aaron | 2022 Manchester | 01:28:20 | |
| Laycock Jon | 2023 London | 01:28:16 | |
| Wolfering Demian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:27 | |
| Riezebos Niels | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:27:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
