Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Robertson Doug's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Robertson Doug's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Robertson Doug's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Robertson Doug's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:08 | 50:59 to 44:51 | 82.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:56 | 06:22 to 05:26 | 12.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 06:07 to 05:45 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:18 to 02:16 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Robertson Doug | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 04:51 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 05:04 | 04:33 -00:27 | 04:51 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 09:10 | 05:18 +00:23 | 09:24 -00:14 |
| Sled Push | 01:47 | 14:51 | 03:09 -01:22 | 14:42 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 16:38 | 05:46 +00:28 | 17:51 -01:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 22:52 | 05:26 -01:03 | 23:37 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 27:15 | 05:47 +00:30 | 29:03 -01:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 33:32 | 06:01 +00:06 | 34:50 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 39:39 | 05:58 +00:51 | 40:51 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 46:28 | 04:58 -00:13 | 46:49 -00:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 51:13 | 05:48 +00:57 | 51:47 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 57:58 | 02:22 -00:04 | 57:35 +00:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:50 | 01:00:16 | 05:48 +01:02 | 59:57 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:22 | 01:07:06 | 05:39 +00:43 | 01:05:45 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:23 | 01:13:28 | 06:35 +00:48 | 01:11:24 +02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:20:51 | 07:19 -03:07 | 01:17:59 +02:52 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 01:33:05 | 07:47 +00:24 | 01:33:05 |
Doug Robertson demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, ranking in the top 42% of both his overall category and age group. His overall time was 01:33:05. His strength lies in exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, where he significantly outperformed the average. However, his total running time was 04:45 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. Doug's pacing seemed consistent, but his running segments, particularly from Running 5 to Running 8, suggest fatigue set in, resulting in slower times. Overall, Doug exhibits a stronger profile in strength-based exercises compared to running, suggesting a hybrid profile with a tilt towards strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patenotre Victor | 2024 Singapore | 01:32:43 | |
| Mazeyrac Geoffrey | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:05 | |
| Hodgson Chris | 2021 Birmingham | 01:33:17 | |
| Terrón José Luis | 2023 Madrid | 01:32:36 | |
| Singh Karam | 2024 Sydney | 01:32:41 | |
| Barry Declan | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:32:52 | |
| Fuchs Andreas | 2023 Barcelona | 01:32:59 | |
| Sandig Kevin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:33:16 | |
| Brosowski Michael | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:08 | |
| Kmosko Peter | 2018 Leipzig | 01:32:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
