Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tully Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tully Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tully Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tully Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:19 | 11:30 to 06:11 | 74.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 06:03 to 05:07 | 13.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:19 to 04:55 | 5.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 05:04 to 04:43 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:15 to 02:05 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:22 to 39:22 | 0.0% |
| Tully Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:10 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:10 | 04:28 -00:06 | 04:41 -01:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 07:32 | 05:01 -00:01 | 09:09 -01:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 12:32 | 02:56 -00:19 | 14:10 -01:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 15:09 | 05:27 -00:10 | 17:06 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 20:26 | 05:00 +00:04 | 22:33 -02:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 25:30 | 05:26 -00:08 | 27:33 -02:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 30:48 | 05:23 +00:40 | 32:59 -02:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 36:51 | 05:36 -00:16 | 38:22 -01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 42:11 | 04:51 -00:09 | 43:58 -01:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 46:53 | 05:29 -00:13 | 48:49 -01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 52:09 | 02:12 +00:03 | 54:18 -02:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 54:24 | 05:27 +00:14 | 56:30 -02:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 01:00:05 | 05:10 +00:09 | 01:01:57 -01:52 |
| Running 8 | 04:24 | 01:05:24 | 06:05 -01:41 | 01:07:07 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 11:30 | 01:09:48 | 06:35 +04:55 | 01:13:12 -03:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:33 | 01:26:43 | 06:56 -01:23 | 01:26:43 |
In general, Conor Tully demonstrated commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race. His overall rank of 281 out of 362 athletes, which places him in the top 77% of all participants, is not an easy feat. He stood out particularly in the total running time, which he completed 4 minutes faster than the average athlete, highlighting his superior running skills. His best running lap time was impressive as well, though there were some segments where he fell short.
His pacing was generally well maintained, but there was a notable slowdown in his performance in the later segments. This could be an indication that Conor started too fast and may need to work on regulating his energy expenditure throughout the race. Given his faster total running time, Conor appears to have a runner profile. This suggests that while he excels in running, he may need to focus more on strength training to improve his overall performance.
Moving forward, Conor should consider implementing the following strategies during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lieffijn Wouter | 2022 Maastricht | 01:26:46 | |
| Corcoran Anthony | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:42 | |
| Dorn Andreas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:26:35 | |
| Moorrees Flynn | 2024 Brisbane | 01:26:43 | |
| Walker Seb | 2022 Birmingham | 01:26:59 | |
| Mclaughlin Ryan | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:24 | |
| Treichel Richard | 2018 Essen | 01:27:11 | |
| Router Sam | 2024 London | 01:26:13 | |
| Lush Andrew | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:25 | |
| Ginesi Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:33:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
