Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 602 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Racherds Virgill's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Racherds Virgill's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Racherds Virgill's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Racherds Virgill's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 14:12 | 01:07:15 to 53:03 | 90.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 09:08 to 07:41 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Racherds Virgill | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:30 | 00:00 | 05:31 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 06:30 | 04:51 -00:28 | 05:31 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 08:02 | 10:53 | 06:13 +01:49 | 10:22 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 18:55 | 03:52 -01:28 | 16:35 +02:20 |
| Running 3 | 08:17 | 21:19 | 06:59 +01:18 | 20:27 +00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 05:53 | 29:36 | 06:45 -00:52 | 27:26 +02:10 |
| Running 4 | 08:34 | 35:29 | 06:56 +01:38 | 34:11 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:08 | 44:03 | 07:50 +01:18 | 41:07 +02:56 |
| Running 5 | 09:15 | 53:11 | 07:19 +01:56 | 48:57 +04:14 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 01:02:26 | 05:25 -00:34 | 56:16 +06:10 |
| Running 6 | 08:45 | 01:07:17 | 07:00 +01:45 | 01:01:41 +05:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 01:16:02 | 02:48 -01:01 | 01:08:41 +07:21 |
| Running 7 | 08:47 | 01:17:49 | 07:01 +01:46 | 01:11:29 +06:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:26:36 | 07:21 -02:22 | 01:18:30 +08:06 |
| Running 8 | 09:09 | 01:31:35 | 08:38 +00:31 | 01:25:51 +05:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:04 | 01:40:44 | 09:29 -03:25 | 01:34:29 +06:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:29 | 01:54:08 | 10:10 -02:41 | 01:54:08 |
Virgill Racherds delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 66% overall. Notably, his strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls were significantly faster than average, indicating a strong strength profile. However, his total running time was 11:24 slower than the average, suggesting that his running needs improvement. His pacing throughout the race suggests a consistent approach, without any drastic variances, but the overall slower running times indicate a need to enhance aerobic efficiency and speed. The Roxzone time was faster than average, demonstrating good transition management.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weinhardt Sven | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:54:01 | |
| Wilkie Allan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:02 | |
| Barić Ivan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:53:50 | |
| Castel Elias | 2023 Paris | 01:54:24 | |
| Flavell Doug | 2024 Brisbane | 01:53:40 | |
| Pylev Vadim | 2022 Valencia | 01:54:35 | |
| Heinen Pascal | 2023 Köln | 01:53:49 | |
| Sbordone Brandon | 2022 New York | 01:54:03 | |
| Rudolph Chris | 2020 Hannover | 01:54:13 | |
| Rebosura Richard | 2024 Singapore | 01:54:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
