Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Notarangelo Gemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Notarangelo Gemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Notarangelo Gemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Notarangelo Gemma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:36 | 04:15 to 02:39 | 48.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:17 | 06:50 to 05:33 | 39.1% |
| Run Total | 00:13 | 46:15 to 46:02 | 6.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 06:09 to 06:01 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:08 to 05:05 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Notarangelo Gemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 04:59 | 05:09 -00:01 | 05:11 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 10:07 | 05:35 -00:10 | 10:20 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 04:15 | 15:32 | 02:48 +01:27 | 15:55 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 19:47 | 05:53 -00:02 | 18:43 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 06:50 | 25:38 | 05:55 +00:55 | 24:36 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 32:28 | 05:54 +00:03 | 30:31 +01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:09 | 38:25 | 06:18 -00:09 | 36:25 +02:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 44:34 | 06:03 -00:14 | 42:43 +01:51 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 50:23 | 05:26 -00:14 | 48:46 +01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 55:35 | 05:57 -00:07 | 54:12 +01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 01:01:25 | 02:20 -00:30 | 01:00:09 +01:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 01:03:15 | 05:55 -00:12 | 01:02:29 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 01:08:58 | 04:55 -00:41 | 01:08:24 +00:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:13:12 | 06:23 +00:22 | 01:13:19 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:36 | 01:19:57 | 05:08 -00:32 | 01:19:42 +00:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:32:00 | 07:10 +00:26 | 01:32:00 |
In terms of her running performance, Gemma's total running time was 46 minutes and 15 seconds, which was 49 seconds slower than the average for her finish time. However, her best running lap was 4 minutes and 59 seconds, which was 1 second faster than the average. This indicates that Gemma has a strong running ability but could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the Roxzone.
In conclusion, Gemma Notarangelo had a strong performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race. She demonstrated strengths in running and certain segments of the race. However, there are areas for improvement, including the sled push, sled pull, Roxzone, and Burpees Broad Jump segments. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength and power exercises, improving transition efficiency, and maintaining a steady pace, Gemma can enhance her performance in these areas and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miles Naomi | 2024 Hamburg | 01:31:56 | |
| Williams Melanie | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:31:57 | |
| Monti Laura | 2024 Milan | 01:32:13 | |
| Pilawachmielewska Agnieszka | 2024 Katowice | 01:31:35 | |
| Scott Jenny | 2024 Dublin | 01:31:49 | |
| Payne Imi | 2024 Paris | 01:32:25 | |
| Renzi Maddalena | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:21 | |
| Leary Birgit | 2022 Dallas | 01:32:11 | |
| Perez Stephanie | 2023 Houston | 01:32:26 | |
| Berti Nicole | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:31:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
