Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 965 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnamara Liam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnamara Liam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnamara Liam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnamara Liam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:25 | 54:30 to 50:05 | 70.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 06:59 to 06:11 | 12.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 03:18 to 02:40 | 10.1% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:39 to 05:13 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:07 to 06:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Mcnamara Liam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:16 | 04:44 -00:24 | 05:15 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 09:36 | 05:46 -00:17 | 09:59 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 15:05 | 03:38 -00:58 | 15:45 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 07:27 | 17:45 | 06:27 +01:00 | 19:23 -01:38 |
| Sled Pull | 06:59 | 25:12 | 06:17 +00:42 | 25:50 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 07:24 | 32:11 | 06:25 +00:59 | 32:07 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 39:35 | 07:12 -01:54 | 38:32 +01:03 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 44:53 | 06:41 +00:22 | 45:44 -00:51 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 51:56 | 05:15 +00:24 | 52:25 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 07:32 | 57:35 | 06:28 +01:04 | 57:40 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:18 | 01:05:07 | 02:39 +00:39 | 01:04:08 +00:59 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:08:25 | 06:29 +00:37 | 01:06:47 +01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:07 | 01:15:31 | 06:40 -00:33 | 01:13:16 +02:15 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:21:38 | 07:46 -00:29 | 01:19:56 +01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:28:55 | 08:44 -02:50 | 01:27:42 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 11:11 | 01:45:49 | 09:23 +01:48 | 01:45:49 |
In terms of pacing, Liam's overall running time of 00:54:30 was 04:38 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:16 was 00:10 slower than the average, indicating that his speed could be improved.
In conclusion, Liam Mcnamara showed a solid performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, improving running form, and efficient transitions, he can work towards improving his running speed, endurance, and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schachenhofer Christian | 2019 Wien | 01:45:46 | |
| Schermann Clem Carlos | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:45:29 | |
| Almutawa Salem | 2023 Dubai | 01:45:54 | |
| Williams Leon | 2022 London | 01:45:52 | |
| Walgien Mitchell | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:46:02 | |
| Shorten Justin | 2024 Poznan | 01:46:17 | |
| Sabeur Armin | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:46:04 | |
| Horner Steven | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:45:36 | |
| Richards Barry | 2024 New York | 01:45:31 | |
| Uceda Vicente | 2023 Bilbao | 01:45:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:51 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
