Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 968 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gregory Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gregory Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gregory Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gregory Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:27 | 09:51 to 06:24 | 53.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:18 | 09:40 to 08:22 | 20.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 08:05 to 06:56 | 17.8% |
| Rowing | 00:33 | 05:45 to 05:12 | 8.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:26 to 46:26 | 0.0% |
| Gregory Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:32 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:32 | 04:43 -00:06 | 05:17 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 10:09 | 05:47 -00:52 | 10:00 +00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 15:04 | 03:39 -00:57 | 15:47 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 17:46 | 06:27 -00:51 | 19:26 -01:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 23:22 | 06:16 -01:04 | 25:53 -02:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 28:34 | 06:24 -00:41 | 32:09 -03:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:05 | 34:17 | 07:04 +01:01 | 38:33 -04:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 42:22 | 06:41 -00:36 | 45:37 -03:15 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 48:27 | 05:14 +00:31 | 52:18 -03:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 54:12 | 06:29 -00:35 | 57:32 -03:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:00:06 | 02:37 -00:30 | 01:04:01 -03:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:02:13 | 06:28 -00:53 | 01:06:38 -04:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:51 | 01:07:48 | 06:37 +03:14 | 01:13:06 -05:18 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:17:39 | 07:44 -00:34 | 01:19:43 -02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 09:40 | 01:24:49 | 08:39 +01:01 | 01:27:27 -02:38 |
| Roxzone | 11:00 | 01:45:21 | 09:15 +01:45 | 01:45:21 |
Mark Gregory's performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox event showed a strong running capability, as evidenced by his total running time of 00:46:26, which was 05:12 faster than the average. This suggests that Mark has a runner profile and would benefit from focusing more on strength training to balance his overall performance. Despite a solid pace in the middle running segments, his running 1 split was slightly slower, indicating a cautious start, possibly to conserve energy for later stages. His overall rank was 411 out of 688, placing him in the top 59%, and his age group rank was 104 out of 156, placing him in the top 66%. This indicates room for improvement, particularly in non-running segments, where he lost significant time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roos Mats | 2022 Maastricht | 01:44:55 | |
| Anthony Pholasa | 2023 Madrid | 01:44:56 | |
| Mudge Matt | 2024 Melbourne | 01:44:59 | |
| Byrne Kevin | 2024 London | 01:45:31 | |
| Thurlow Lee | 2023 London | 01:45:28 | |
| Brustad Kåre A. | 2024 Stockholm | 01:45:10 | |
| Perini Massimo | 2024 Milan | 01:45:27 | |
| Turner Adam | 2024 Brisbane | 01:45:29 | |
| Parkin Tim | 2022 London | 01:45:13 | |
| Ilokieleka Benjamin | 2023 Milan | 01:45:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
