Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 251 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Double Michelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Double Michelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Double Michelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Double Michelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 41:47 to 39:50 | 56.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 04:15 to 03:32 | 20.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:43 to 02:23 | 9.7% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:12 to 04:55 | 8.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:47 to 04:41 | 2.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 1.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Double Michelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:53 | 04:44 +00:03 | 04:22 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 09:40 | 04:46 +00:05 | 09:06 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 04:15 | 14:31 | 03:54 +00:21 | 13:52 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 18:46 | 05:08 -00:03 | 17:46 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 23:51 | 06:05 -00:30 | 22:54 +00:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 29:26 | 05:09 +00:04 | 28:59 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 34:39 | 04:42 -00:40 | 34:08 +00:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 38:41 | 05:16 -00:01 | 38:50 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 43:56 | 04:59 +00:13 | 44:06 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 49:08 | 05:11 +00:05 | 49:05 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 54:24 | 02:33 +00:10 | 54:16 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 57:07 | 05:14 +00:02 | 56:49 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 01:02:23 | 04:53 -00:08 | 01:02:03 +00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:02 | 01:07:08 | 05:37 +00:25 | 01:06:56 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:13:10 | 06:02 -00:57 | 01:12:33 +00:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:17 | 01:24:24 | 05:49 +00:28 | 01:24:24 |
Michelle's overall time of 01:24:24 was impressive, showcasing her endurance and stamina. Her total running time of 00:41:47 was particularly noteworthy, as it was 00:29 faster than the average. This suggests that Michelle has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on improving her running abilities.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Michelle can further enhance her performance in future Hyrox races. With her dedication and determination, she has the potential to achieve even greater success in her age group and overall rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kurien Sonia | 2024 Singapore | 01:24:29 | |
| Miedl Jasmine | 2023 München | 01:24:18 | |
| Daulton Mckenzie | 2021 New York | 01:23:55 | |
| Twigg Morgan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:24:49 | |
| Huntley Emma | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:17 | |
| Hammond Krista | 2023 London | 01:24:28 | |
| Ferran Mariam | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:24:29 | |
| Hammill Holly | 2023 London | 01:24:05 | |
| Hickey Olivia | 2023 London | 01:23:59 | |
| Smyth Lorraine | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:24:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:30:50 | |
| 2022 London | 01:24:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
