Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Crowe Richard's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Crowe Richard's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Crowe Richard's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Crowe Richard's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 05:40 to 04:30 | 35.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 06:17 to 05:30 | 23.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:44 | 04:59 to 04:15 | 22.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:35 to 04:16 | 9.6% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:53 to 04:36 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:33 to 38:33 | 0.0% |
| Crowe Richard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:07 | 04:21 +00:14 | 04:23 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:18 | 09:42 | 04:44 -00:26 | 08:44 +00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 14:00 | 02:45 -00:24 | 13:28 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 16:21 | 05:08 -00:12 | 16:13 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 21:17 | 04:36 +00:23 | 21:21 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:11 | 26:16 | 05:06 +00:05 | 25:57 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:40 | 31:27 | 04:55 +00:45 | 31:03 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 37:07 | 05:15 -00:24 | 35:58 +01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 41:58 | 04:41 +00:12 | 41:13 +00:45 |
| Running 6 | 04:47 | 46:51 | 05:09 -00:22 | 45:54 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 51:38 | 02:04 -00:22 | 51:03 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 53:20 | 05:07 -00:20 | 53:07 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 58:07 | 04:46 -00:31 | 58:14 -00:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:39 | 01:02:22 | 05:36 -00:57 | 01:03:00 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:07:01 | 05:59 +00:18 | 01:08:36 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:20:47 | 06:12 +01:26 | 01:20:47 |
Richard Crowe's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was commendable, securing a top 24% position overall and a top 13% position in his age group (45-49). He demonstrated an impressive running profile, with his total running time clocking in at 2 minutes 11 seconds faster than the average. His best running lap was impressive, showcasing his strong endurance and speed. However, there seems to be a contrast in his performance during the first few segments of the race where he started slower than the average, specifically during the Running 1 segment. His pacing improved significantly as the race progressed, with most running segments performed faster than average.
Despite a strong overall performance, there are areas that require improvement. The segments that displayed the most room for improvement include the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Sled Pull, Ski Erg, and Rowing.
Richard should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Luna Gardón Jonathan | 2021 Madrid | 01:20:42 | |
| Van Dyk Rian | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:20:31 | |
| Harley Dan | 2024 London | 01:20:29 | |
| Engelhardt Fabian | 2023 München | 01:20:19 | |
| Georgitsis Ryley | 2022 Chicago | 01:21:12 | |
| Humphries Cord | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:57 | |
| Alty Simon | 2023 London | 01:21:16 | |
| Kopp Frederik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:19 | |
| Robinson Thomas | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:43 | |
| Byrne Derek | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
