Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ebel Yann's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ebel Yann's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ebel Yann's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ebel Yann's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:41 | 40:39 to 39:58 | 29.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:58 to 04:21 | 26.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:01 to 02:32 | 21.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:31 to 04:18 | 9.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:05 to 01:56 | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:43 to 04:38 | 3.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:35 to 04:31 | 2.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Ebel Yann | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 05:14 | 04:23 +00:08 | 04:28 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:45 | 04:46 +00:01 | 08:51 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 14:32 | 02:45 +00:16 | 13:37 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 17:33 | 05:10 -00:12 | 16:22 +01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:31 | 04:40 +00:18 | 21:32 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 27:29 | 05:08 -00:05 | 26:12 +01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 32:32 | 04:58 -00:33 | 31:20 +01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 36:57 | 05:18 -00:07 | 36:18 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 42:08 | 04:43 +00:00 | 41:36 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 46:51 | 05:11 -00:22 | 46:19 +00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 51:40 | 02:06 -00:01 | 51:30 +00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 53:45 | 05:09 -00:02 | 53:36 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 58:52 | 04:50 -00:15 | 58:45 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:03:27 | 05:40 -00:06 | 01:03:35 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:09:01 | 06:06 -00:52 | 01:09:15 -00:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:37 | 01:21:42 | 06:21 +01:16 | 01:21:42 |
Yann Ebel delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 257, placing him in the top 22% out of 1130 athletes. Notably, his total running time of 00:40:39 was 00:35 faster than the average, underscoring his strength in running. However, the Roxzone time was considerably slower, suggesting room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. Yann's pacing was consistent, with no significant drop-off in performance, indicating a well-managed race strategy. Based on his results, Yann exhibits a hybrid profile but leans slightly more towards running prowess.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Santorelli Ernesto | 2021 New York | 01:21:26 | |
| Klauz Peter | 2024 Perth | 01:21:29 | |
| Stammen Edwin | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:21:51 | |
| Zinder Philipp | 2023 Hannover | 01:21:40 | |
| Gutierrez Tony | 2022 Dallas | 01:21:35 | |
| Griffiths Andrew | 2024 London | 01:22:10 | |
| Arjona Abad Adolfo | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:40 | |
| Ellemann Jasper | 2024 Poznan | 01:22:04 | |
| Stewart Phil | 2023 Manchester | 01:21:54 | |
| Rößing Rouven | 2020 Hannover | 01:21:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Stuttgart | 01:18:12 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:01 | |
| 2021 Stuttgart | 01:27:29 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:27:53 | |
| World Championships | 01:19:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
