Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 980 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clinton Gemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clinton Gemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clinton Gemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clinton Gemma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:18 | 08:26 to 06:08 | 92.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 05:37 to 05:25 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:45 to 48:45 | 0.0% |
| Clinton Gemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 05:29 -00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:01 | 05:18 -00:36 | 05:29 -00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 09:43 | 05:53 -00:30 | 10:47 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 15:06 | 02:58 -00:08 | 16:40 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 17:56 | 06:14 -00:28 | 19:38 -01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 08:26 | 23:42 | 06:25 +02:01 | 25:52 -02:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 32:08 | 06:16 -00:15 | 32:17 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 38:09 | 07:09 -01:34 | 38:33 -00:24 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 43:44 | 06:27 -00:05 | 45:42 -01:58 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 50:06 | 05:36 -00:07 | 52:09 -02:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:44 | 55:35 | 06:20 +00:24 | 57:45 -02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:02:19 | 02:26 -00:18 | 01:04:05 -01:46 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:04:27 | 06:18 -00:05 | 01:06:31 -02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:10:40 | 05:24 -00:29 | 01:12:49 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:15:35 | 07:00 +00:19 | 01:18:13 -02:38 |
| Wall Balls | 05:37 | 01:22:54 | 05:40 -00:03 | 01:25:13 -02:19 |
| Roxzone | 10:24 | 01:38:46 | 07:53 +02:31 | 01:38:46 |
Gemma Clinton delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, ranking in the top 25% overall and top 46% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:38:46, with a total running time of 00:48:45, which was 02:02 faster than average. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting that Gemma excels in endurance and cardio-based activities. Her pacing strategy was initially aggressive, as evidenced by the first four running segments being significantly faster than average. However, her pace slightly declined in the later segments, which could suggest energy management issues over the course of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Halloran Danielle | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:08 | |
| Koch Miriana | 2019 Hamburg | 01:38:59 | |
| Nascimento Rebecca | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:59 | |
| Wilde Annabel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:38:33 | |
| Tan Gillian | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:38:36 | |
| Bitterbier Tina | 2019 Leipzig | 01:38:49 | |
| Moolman Bernadine | 2024 Cape Town | 01:39:11 | |
| Darling Nicola | 2023 London | 01:38:41 | |
| Kim Hanwool | 2024 Incheon | 01:38:23 | |
| Richardson Tennille | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
