Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 238 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Santafé Pilar's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Santafé Pilar's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Santafé Pilar's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Santafé Pilar's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:00 | 39:06 to 38:06 | 29.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 05:15 to 04:23 | 25.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:42 | 02:54 to 02:12 | 20.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 05:38 to 05:14 | 11.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:54 to 04:36 | 8.9% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:56 to 04:49 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Santafé Pilar | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:17 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 03:48 | 04:40 +00:14 | 04:17 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:22 | 08:42 | 04:38 -00:16 | 08:57 -00:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 13:04 | 03:37 -00:53 | 13:35 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 15:48 | 04:58 +00:03 | 17:12 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 20:49 | 05:43 -00:29 | 22:10 -01:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 26:03 | 04:56 -00:09 | 27:53 -01:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:07 | 30:50 | 04:26 -00:19 | 32:49 -01:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 34:57 | 05:00 +00:02 | 37:15 -02:18 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 39:59 | 04:55 +00:01 | 42:15 -02:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 44:55 | 04:57 +00:11 | 47:10 -02:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:54 | 50:03 | 02:22 +00:32 | 52:07 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 52:57 | 05:00 +00:13 | 54:29 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 58:10 | 04:33 +00:42 | 59:29 -01:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:03:25 | 05:19 +00:29 | 01:04:02 -00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:09:13 | 05:34 +00:04 | 01:09:21 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 05:31 | 01:20:14 | 05:19 +00:12 | 01:20:14 |
Pilar's overall time of 01:20:14 was solid, and her total running time of 00:39:06 was particularly impressive, being 01:37 faster than the average for her finish time. This indicates that her running ability is a strength and she performed well in the running segments of the race.
However, there are areas where Pilar can improve to further enhance her performance. The segments where she lost the most time compared to the average were Wall Balls, Sandbag Lunges, and Farmers Carry. These segments should be the focus of her training and improvement strategies.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified areas, Pilar Santafé can continue to excel in Hyrox races and achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Abraham Folawe | 2022 London | 01:20:43 | |
| Groholy Babett | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:20:02 | |
| Heard Emily | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:11 | |
| Williams Kelly | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:20:19 | |
| Sanz Cid Silvia | 2022 Valencia | 01:19:59 | |
| Willis Hannah | 2022 Las Vegas | 01:20:33 | |
| Kamm Corinne | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:20:19 | |
| LaBand Analise | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:39 | |
| Maciejewska Agnieszka | 2024 Katowice | 01:20:34 | |
| White Cora | 2024 Taipei | 01:19:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Leipzig | 01:19:44 | |
| 2023 Malaga | 01:14:29 | |
| 2022 Valencia | 01:19:10 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:15:38 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:17:51 | |
| 2022 Madrid | 01:21:35 | |
| 2023 Valencia | 01:18:02 | |
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:24:17 | |
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:19:36 | |
| 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:14:14 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:20:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
