Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Imielski Nicolas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Imielski Nicolas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Imielski Nicolas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Imielski Nicolas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:05 | 03:31 to 02:26 | 30.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 05:09 to 04:12 | 26.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 04:57 to 04:22 | 16.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:31 | 05:56 to 05:25 | 14.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:27 to 04:15 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 3.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 04:31 to 04:25 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:10 to 38:10 | 0.0% |
| Imielski Nicolas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:39 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:39 | 04:21 +00:06 | 04:23 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:06 | 04:43 -00:05 | 08:44 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 12:44 | 02:44 +00:47 | 13:27 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 16:15 | 05:06 -00:12 | 16:11 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 21:09 | 04:33 +00:36 | 21:17 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 26:18 | 05:05 -00:13 | 25:50 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:31 | 31:10 | 04:50 -00:19 | 30:55 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 35:41 | 05:14 -00:09 | 35:45 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 40:46 | 04:40 +00:02 | 40:59 -00:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 45:28 | 05:06 -00:04 | 45:39 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 50:30 | 02:02 -00:10 | 50:45 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 52:22 | 05:05 -00:17 | 52:47 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 57:10 | 04:41 +00:16 | 57:52 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 01:02:07 | 05:34 -00:18 | 01:02:33 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:56 | 01:07:23 | 05:56 +00:00 | 01:08:07 -00:44 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:20:10 | 06:07 +00:53 | 01:20:10 |
Overall, Nicolas Imielski demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX event. His total running time of 00:38:10, which was 02:17 faster than average, reflects his strong running abilities. This time placed him in the top 33% of all participants and the top 37% in his age group (30-34). Furthermore, his best running lap was 00:04:38, demonstrating consistent speed and endurance. However, his roxzone time was 00:54 slower than average, indicating he took longer rest periods or transitions between exercise zones. This could suggest a need for improved overall fitness and transition efficiency.
Regarding his pacing, Nicolas appears to have maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, starting fast and maintaining this speed effectively. His profile leans towards more of a runner, therefore, some focus on strength training may help balance his overall performance.
Some strategies that Nicolas might consider for future races could include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Stewart | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:56 | |
| Amin Tristan | 2023 London | 01:19:48 | |
| Restituto Sanchez Jose | 2022 Wien | 01:19:55 | |
| Khomenko Ihor | 2021 Madrid | 01:20:09 | |
| Broadley Stephen | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:50 | |
| Field Ryan | 2023 London | 01:20:30 | |
| Alexander Phil | 2023 Dublin | 01:20:37 | |
| Moosbrugger Lukas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:20:00 | |
| Teli Dil | 2024 London | 01:20:17 | |
| Ghazi Ali | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:20:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
