Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 109 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Garcia Silvia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Garcia Silvia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Garcia Silvia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Garcia Silvia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:01 | 36:02 to 34:01 | 69.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:12 to 01:47 | 14.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 04:28 to 04:15 | 7.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 03:28 to 03:20 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:36 to 04:32 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:24 to 04:21 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Garcia Silvia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 03:50 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:35 | 04:25 -00:01 | 03:50 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 07:59 | 04:03 +00:16 | 08:15 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 12:18 | 03:03 -00:47 | 12:18 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 04:31 | 14:34 | 04:17 +00:14 | 15:21 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 19:05 | 04:35 -00:07 | 19:38 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 04:34 | 23:33 | 04:20 +00:14 | 24:13 -00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:28 | 28:07 | 03:39 -00:11 | 28:33 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 31:35 | 04:24 +00:21 | 32:12 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 36:20 | 04:35 +00:01 | 36:36 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 40:56 | 04:21 +00:17 | 41:11 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 45:34 | 01:58 +00:14 | 45:32 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 47:46 | 04:23 +00:21 | 47:30 +00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:19 | 52:30 | 03:48 -00:29 | 51:53 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 05:01 | 55:49 | 04:36 +00:25 | 55:41 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 03:17 | 01:00:50 | 04:31 -01:14 | 01:00:17 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:17 | 01:09:14 | 04:26 +00:51 | 01:09:14 |
Silvia had a strong performance in several segments, including Running 1, Ski Erg, and Sled Push, where she was faster than the average. Her best running lap was 00:03:35, which was 23 seconds faster than the average. She also performed well in Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where she was faster than the average.
However, Silvia struggled in the Roxzone segment, where she lost 57 seconds compared to the average. She also had slower times in the Farmers Carry and Running 7 segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Loftesnes Inga | 2023 Stockholm | 01:09:39 | |
| Laue Annika | 2022 Bremen | 01:09:07 | |
| Clark Lovisa | 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:44 | |
| Simonson Kayti | 2024 Anaheim | 01:09:04 | |
| Hatwell Bekkie | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:09:07 | |
| Gardner Fern | 2024 London | 01:08:46 | |
| Hardes Antje | 2023 Barcelona | 01:08:54 | |
| Macintosh Vicky | 2024 Milan | 01:09:43 | |
| Sheehy Leanne | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:10 | |
| Keys Bryony | 2024 Glasgow | 01:09:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
