Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
08:07.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Janusz Banaszczyk, competing in the HYROX category for the age group 40-44, placed in the top 51% in the overall rank and top 49% in his age group. This indicates a commendable performance on the whole. His total running time, however, was 6:44 slower than the average, suggesting a potential area for improvement. He showed a consistent performance in the strength-based segments of the race, showing a stronger strength profile than a running profile.
His pacing in the initial running segments (running 1 to running 4) was slower than average, indicating a slower start. However, he gradually picked up the pace and showed improvement in the following running segments. This suggests that he might benefit from a slightly faster initial pace.
Segments to Improve:
Running: The total running time and the 7th and 8th running segments were significantly slower than average, indicating that this is a key area for improvement. Incorporating more endurance running into the training routine can help improve speed and stamina over longer distances. High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) workouts can also be beneficial for improving speed. This involves short bursts of high-intensity running followed by a short period of rest or lower-intensity exercise.
Roxzone: The Roxzone time was slower than average, suggesting that the transition time needs improvement. To improve this, focus on efficient transition strategies during training. This could involve simulating race transitions during training sessions to build speed and efficiency. Improving overall fitness will also help in reducing transition time.
Race Strategies:
Starting the race at a slightly faster pace could potentially improve overall race time, as Janusz seems to have a good recovery rate and can maintain speed in the later segments of the race. He should also focus on ensuring smooth and quick transitions between segments to save time. Additionally, he should prioritize his energy expenditure according to the segments, putting more energy into the running segments where he can gain more time.
It would be beneficial to incorporate real-time pacing strategies in the training routine as well to better manage energy and timing during the actual race. This could involve using a heart rate monitor or smartwatch to keep track of pace and adjust it according to the planned race strategy.