Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Levermann Wibke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Levermann Wibke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Levermann Wibke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Levermann Wibke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:21 | 50:55 to 46:34 | 98.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:54 to 04:49 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Levermann Wibke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:15 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:05 | 05:08 | 05:10 -00:05 | 05:15 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 10:13 | 05:37 +00:13 | 10:25 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 16:03 | 02:51 -00:38 | 16:02 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 18:16 | 05:55 +00:32 | 18:53 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 24:43 | 06:00 -00:38 | 24:48 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 30:05 | 05:58 +00:30 | 30:48 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 36:33 | 06:31 -01:59 | 36:46 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:42 | 41:05 | 06:08 +00:34 | 43:17 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 47:47 | 05:27 -00:22 | 49:25 -01:38 |
| Running 6 | 06:31 | 52:52 | 06:02 +00:29 | 54:52 -02:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 59:23 | 02:19 -00:16 | 01:00:54 -01:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 01:01:26 | 05:59 +00:25 | 01:03:13 -01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:07:50 | 05:01 -00:07 | 01:09:12 -01:22 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:12:44 | 06:29 +00:59 | 01:14:13 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 03:53 | 01:20:12 | 05:13 -01:20 | 01:20:42 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 09:18 | 01:33:16 | 07:21 +01:57 | 01:33:16 |
When analyzing Levermann's splits, it is evident that her running segments (Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8) were slower than average. Her best running lap was completed in 00:05:08, which was 00:07 slower than the average for her finish. However, she performed better than average in some strength-based segments, such as Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls.
10. Best Lap: Levermann's best lap time was 00:05:08, which was 00:07 slower than the average. To improve this segment, she should focus on increasing her running speed and endurance. Incorporating speed workouts, such as interval training and fartlek runs, into her training routine will help improve her performance in this segment.
By incorporating these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Levermann can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and achieve her goals in the 40-44 age group category.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kuske Barbara | 2023 Manchester | 01:33:30 | |
| Khounvichai Sandra | 2024 Dallas | 01:33:42 | |
| Abate Marie | 2024 New York | 01:33:02 | |
| Milnes Fran | 2024 Paris | 01:33:16 | |
| Keller Natalie | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:33:40 | |
| Canario Rachel | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:46 | |
| Hamilton Alicia | 2022 Chicago | 01:33:23 | |
| Smith Katie | 2022 Manchester | 01:33:11 | |
| Van Der Waal Frederike | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:33:42 | |
| Busmann Laura | 2021 Hamburg | 01:32:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Berlin | 01:35:37 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:29:58 | |
| 2020 Hannover | 01:33:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
