Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Corvers Delano's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Corvers Delano's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Corvers Delano's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Corvers Delano's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:41 | 51:40 to 47:59 | 89.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 06:02 to 05:47 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:17 to 05:06 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:34 to 07:34 | 0.0% |
| Corvers Delano | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:08 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 06:12 | 04:40 -00:06 | 05:08 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 10:46 | 05:38 +00:09 | 09:48 +00:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 16:33 | 03:25 -00:06 | 15:26 +01:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:52 | 06:08 +00:04 | 18:51 +01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 26:04 | 05:54 +00:08 | 24:59 +01:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 32:06 | 06:08 +00:00 | 30:53 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 38:14 | 06:41 -01:00 | 37:01 +01:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:55 | 43:55 | 06:25 +00:30 | 43:42 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 50:50 | 05:09 +00:08 | 50:07 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 56:07 | 06:14 +00:00 | 55:16 +00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:02:21 | 02:34 -00:30 | 01:01:30 +00:51 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 01:04:25 | 06:13 +00:11 | 01:04:04 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 01:10:49 | 06:18 -01:39 | 01:10:17 +00:32 |
| Running 8 | 07:51 | 01:15:28 | 07:16 +00:35 | 01:16:35 -01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:23:19 | 08:13 -00:39 | 01:23:51 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 10:01 | 01:40:45 | 08:41 +01:20 | 01:40:45 |
Delano's overall time for the race was 01:40:45. His total running time was 00:51:40, which was 04:50 slower than the average time. This indicates that Delano may need to focus on improving his running performance.
In terms of splits, Delano had some areas where he performed better than the average time, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Push. However, he also had some segments where he was slower than the average, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, Running 7, Rowing, and Running 8. These segments should be the focus of his improvement efforts.
In conclusion, Delano Corvers performed well in the Hyrox race, placing in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. However, there are certain areas where he can improve, particularly in running segments and transitions. By incorporating specific training strategies, drills, and exercises, Delano can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Sean | 2022 London | 01:40:46 | |
| Inverardi Ivan | 2024 Turin | 01:40:41 | |
| Schlagwein Robin | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:40:47 | |
| Russell Craig | 2024 Sydney | 01:40:50 | |
| Peña Hernandez Juan Carlos | 2023 Paris | 01:40:56 | |
| Luzano Angelo | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:40:44 | |
| Nugent Jack | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:40:49 | |
| Axente Daniel | 2023 Dublin | 01:41:10 | |
| Atmajaya Putu | 2024 Singapore | 01:40:36 | |
| Kor Shu Yen | 2023 Singapore | 01:40:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
